<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: CI Relationships now showing up in CMDB forum</title>
    <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3561148#M21016</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out-of-the-box, the relationsips betwwen the class&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;cmdb_ci_ip_address&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;and any child of&amp;nbsp;cmdb_ci_hardware are hidden from the relationships formatter and the dependency map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is defined int he CI relation Filters table (&amp;nbsp;cmdb_rel_filter ).&lt;BR /&gt;You can disable this rule by setting its Active attribute on "false".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.servicenow.com/community/image/serverpage/image-id/520334i5592A5CCFC0D1FC3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" alt="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amar_Be</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-18T08:48:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CI Relationships now showing up</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3546613#M20747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I added the cmdb_ci_ip_address class to my application which is a dependent class. In my IntegrationHub ETL, in the "Add Relationships" step, I added an Owns:Owned By relationship between cmdb_ci_zos_server class and cmdb_ci_ip_address class. My ingestion of the IP Address data was successful and the relationships also showed up in the cmdb_rel_ci table.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to show these relationships in the CI information so I made a view and added the "CI Relations(Formatter)" in the view, but these relationships aren't showing there and neither are they showing up when I open the CI in the CMDB workspace.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone knows how to resolve this, please let me know, thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 18:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3546613#M20747</guid>
      <dc:creator>aditimittal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-20T18:07:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CI Relationships now showing up</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3546796#M20749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/878475"&gt;@aditimittal&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Since the relationship records are getting created successfully in cmdb_rel_ci, the IntegrationHub ETL mapping and the Add Relationships step appear to be working correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;The issue is most likely related to how cmdb_ci_ip_address is handled/displayed. cmdb_ci_ip_address is a dependent CI class, and dependent CI relationships may not always appear in the standard CI Relations formatter or CMDB Workspace relationship view, even though the relationship exists in cmdb_rel_ci.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I would suggest checking the following:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Confirm the relationship exists in cmdb_rel_ci&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Verify that the record has:&lt;BR /&gt;Parent: cmdb_ci_zos_server&lt;BR /&gt;Child: cmdb_ci_ip_address&lt;BR /&gt;Type: Owns::Owned by&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Check if the relationship is filtered from the formatter/workspace&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some CMDB views/components may exclude dependent CI classes from the standard relationship display to avoid showing supporting/dependent records.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Validate the class configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Go to CI Class Manager and review the configuration for:&lt;BR /&gt;IP Address [cmdb_ci_ip_address]&lt;BR /&gt;Check whether it is configured as a dependent class and whether there are any relationship/display rules affecting it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Test with a non-dependent CI class&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Create the same type of relationship from cmdb_ci_zos_server to a normal CI class. If that relationship appears in the formatter/workspace, then the behavior is specific to the dependent IP Address class.&lt;BR /&gt;As a workaround, if the requirement is to show IP Address data on the CI form, you can add a related list on the cmdb_ci_zos_server form based on cmdb_rel_ci, filtered where the child CI is from cmdb_ci_ip_address. For CMDB Workspace, you may need to configure/customize the workspace component or expose this through a custom related list/section.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;*************************************************************************************************************************************&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If this response helps, please mark it as Accept as Solution and Helpful.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Doing so helps others in the community and encourages me to keep contributing.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Regards&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Vaishali Singh&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Servicenow Developer &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Linkedin - &lt;A href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaishali-singh-2273361bb" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaishali-singh-2273361bb&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 04:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3546796#M20749</guid>
      <dc:creator>vaishali231</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-21T04:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CI Relationships now showing up</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3561148#M21016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out-of-the-box, the relationsips betwwen the class&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;cmdb_ci_ip_address&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;and any child of&amp;nbsp;cmdb_ci_hardware are hidden from the relationships formatter and the dependency map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is defined int he CI relation Filters table (&amp;nbsp;cmdb_rel_filter ).&lt;BR /&gt;You can disable this rule by setting its Active attribute on "false".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.servicenow.com/community/image/serverpage/image-id/520334i5592A5CCFC0D1FC3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" alt="Amar_Be_0-1781772440377.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/cmdb-forum/ci-relationships-now-showing-up/m-p/3561148#M21016</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amar_Be</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-18T08:48:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

