<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: RITM state and stage in ITOM forum</title>
    <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522125#M126848</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/114759"&gt;@bhakti2&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There’s no predefined standard for the State and Stage of RITM, SCTASK, and REQ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It’s important to define a project-level standard; otherwise, excessive custom entries and unnecessary customization will accumulate in the system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rule of thumb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Keep &lt;STRONG&gt;State limited and controlled&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use &lt;STRONG&gt;Stage for customization instead of adding new states&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without a defined model:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Teams start adding &lt;STRONG&gt;custom states/stages&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Duplicate meanings appear (e.g., “In Progress”, “Work in Progress”, “Ongoing”)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reporting becomes inconsistent&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Maintenance becomes difficult&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can refer:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/itsm-forum/request-management-states-and-stages-best-practice/m-p/3413764" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Request Management States and Stages Best Practice?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tanushree Maiti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-09T04:43:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RITM state and stage</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3521977#M126844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there any official ServiceNow documentation that defines the standard State and Stage combinations for Requests (REQ) and Requested Items (RITM) when multiple Catalog Tasks (SCTASK) are associated with a single RITM?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3521977#M126844</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhakti2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-08T19:29:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RITM state and stage</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3521994#M126845</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no official ServiceNow documentation that defines standard State and Stage combinations for REQ or RITM when multiple SCTASKs are involved. REQ, RITM, and SCTASK states are not automatically synchronized unless explicitly configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For additional reference, the following community discussion explains the OOTB behavior and best practices around REQ/RITM state handling:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="" href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this helps, please give a like and mark it as a solution&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3521994#M126845</guid>
      <dc:creator>KanteS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-08T20:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RITM state and stage</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522002#M126846</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I looked into this and wanted to share a quick clarification on how State and Stage work for REQ, RITM, and SCTASK in ServiceNow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There isn’t a strict standard or official mapping for how State and Stage should behave when multiple catalog tasks are tied to a single RITM. It mainly depends on how the flow or workflow is designed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, the way it works is pretty straightforward:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The actual work is done at the Catalog Task(SCTASK)&amp;nbsp;level&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The RITM stays open&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;until all its tasks are completed&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Once all tasks are done, the RITM gets closed (complete or incomplete depending on the outcome)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;And finally, the Request (REQ) closes&amp;nbsp;after all RITMs under it are completed&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Stage field&amp;nbsp;is mostly used just to show progress (like Approval, Fulfillment, Complete), and it can be customized based on the implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So overall, it’s more about the flow logic driving everything rather than a fixed state/stage structure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522002#M126846</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saiprasad_V</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-08T20:40:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RITM state and stage</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522090#M126847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/114759"&gt;@bhakti2&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, there is no defined standard, as state and stages are configurable according to your setup and according to the single company processes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 03:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522090#M126847</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndersBGS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-09T03:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RITM state and stage</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522125#M126848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/114759"&gt;@bhakti2&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There’s no predefined standard for the State and Stage of RITM, SCTASK, and REQ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It’s important to define a project-level standard; otherwise, excessive custom entries and unnecessary customization will accumulate in the system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rule of thumb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Keep &lt;STRONG&gt;State limited and controlled&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use &lt;STRONG&gt;Stage for customization instead of adding new states&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without a defined model:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Teams start adding &lt;STRONG&gt;custom states/stages&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Duplicate meanings appear (e.g., “In Progress”, “Work in Progress”, “Ongoing”)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reporting becomes inconsistent&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Maintenance becomes difficult&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can refer:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/itsm-forum/request-management-states-and-stages-best-practice/m-p/3413764" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Request Management States and Stages Best Practice?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-state-field-for-req/m-p/3290360&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/itom-forum/ritm-state-and-stage/m-p/3522125#M126848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tanushree Maiti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-09T04:43:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

