<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer in SecOps forum</title>
    <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326102#M8321</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is how I solved this for a few large customers:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=view_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_id=3ab7c5cc1bbec150d018c8ca234bcb7d&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_table=x_snc_com_ideation_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_module_id=enhancement_requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 13:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chrismcdevi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-02T13:47:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326100#M8319</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From what I understand:&amp;nbsp;Vulnerabilities which are deferred using an exception rule, if they close and then open whilst deferred no longer retain the deferred status and move to open.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I believe from reading the forums this is as designed and there is another question someone posed here which indicated this is as intended:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A tabindex="-1" title="https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=community_question&amp;amp;sys_id=7c2ba2c3db090d10dd886c8e13961932&amp;amp;view_source=searchresult" href="https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=community_question&amp;amp;sys_id=7c2ba2c3db090d10dd886c8e13961932&amp;amp;view_source=searchResult" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=community_question&amp;amp;sys_id=7c2ba2c3db090d10dd886c8e13961932&amp;amp;view_source=searchResult&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And a linked feature request which I have upvoted.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;still have&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;issue where&amp;nbsp;the business is&amp;nbsp;expecting these vulnerabilities to remain deferred even when they re-open until the deferral end date. Has anyone else experienced this and has anyone come up with a workaround to meet the business expectation? (eg,&amp;nbsp;is there a script/rule/configuration we can change to work around this problem?)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 02:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326100#M8319</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teena H</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-02T02:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326101#M8320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I had to deal with the same requirement.&amp;nbsp; You do not want to add a BR to the vulnerable item table.&amp;nbsp; Instead, create a scripted scheduled job that runs each AM to review all VITs updated yesterday, that are open, to determine if there is an associated exception so you can update accordingly.&amp;nbsp; This approach succeeded.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 13:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326101#M8320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Laseau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-02T13:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326102#M8321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is how I solved this for a few large customers:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=view_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_id=3ab7c5cc1bbec150d018c8ca234bcb7d&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_table=x_snc_com_ideation_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_module_id=enhancement_requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 13:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326102#M8321</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrismcdevi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-02T13:47:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326103#M8322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why do you say no business rules?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 22:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/1326103#M8322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teena H</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-02T22:09:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/2604315#M10723</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the link you have provided is not working, do you have any other link that would work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;appreciate it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 08:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/2604315#M10723</guid>
      <dc:creator>son1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-04T08:02:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Closed VITs in deferral state when re-opened do not defer</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/2625196#M10750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.servicenow.com/ideas?id=view_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_id=3ab7c5cc1bbec150d018c8ca234bcb7d&amp;amp;sysparm_idea_table=x_snc_com_ideation_idea&amp;amp;sysparm_module_id=enhancement_requests" target="_blank"&gt;View Idea Page - Idea Portal (servicenow.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-forum/closed-vits-in-deferral-state-when-re-opened-do-not-defer/m-p/2625196#M10750</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bla_ena</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-26T19:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

