<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question project methodology in SPM forum</title>
    <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/spm-forum/project-methodology/m-p/3321161#M47796</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re currently working on enabling Agile and Hybrid methodologies within our ServiceNow SPM environment and are looking for guidance from the community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At our organization (NOC), the phases we use for Agile/Hybrid projects are:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Envisioning, Conceptualization, Delivery, and Handover&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These differ from the traditional Waterfall phases:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Initiating, Planning, Execution, and Closing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re aiming to configure ServiceNow so that selecting a project methodology (Waterfall or Agile/Hybrid) automatically updates the relevant phases and reflects the change in the top formatter that displays the current project phase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re interested in learning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How have other organizations approached this configuration?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there best practices or platform-supported models for managing multiple methodologies with distinct phase structures?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any lessons learned or recommendations for maintaining workflow logic and reporting integrity?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insights, examples, or references would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 09:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NaureenL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-15T09:31:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>project methodology</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/spm-forum/project-methodology/m-p/3321161#M47796</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re currently working on enabling Agile and Hybrid methodologies within our ServiceNow SPM environment and are looking for guidance from the community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At our organization (NOC), the phases we use for Agile/Hybrid projects are:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Envisioning, Conceptualization, Delivery, and Handover&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These differ from the traditional Waterfall phases:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Initiating, Planning, Execution, and Closing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re aiming to configure ServiceNow so that selecting a project methodology (Waterfall or Agile/Hybrid) automatically updates the relevant phases and reflects the change in the top formatter that displays the current project phase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re interested in learning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How have other organizations approached this configuration?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there best practices or platform-supported models for managing multiple methodologies with distinct phase structures?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any lessons learned or recommendations for maintaining workflow logic and reporting integrity?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insights, examples, or references would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 09:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/spm-forum/project-methodology/m-p/3321161#M47796</guid>
      <dc:creator>NaureenL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-15T09:31:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: project methodology</title>
      <link>https://www.servicenow.com/community/spm-forum/project-methodology/m-p/3321417#M47799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could add the condition of methodology to the Process Flow config (sys_process_flow). You can then call the phases within the formatter whatever you want. You will have 2 records for each phase in that case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MarkManders_0-1752583770522.png" style="width: 766px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.servicenow.com/community/image/serverpage/image-id/455873i10A0371B50779A39/image-dimensions/766x291?v=v2" width="766" height="291" role="button" title="MarkManders_0-1752583770522.png" alt="MarkManders_0-1752583770522.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It depends on what other customizations you are going to make, how much work it will be to maintain it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.servicenow.com/community/spm-forum/project-methodology/m-p/3321417#M47799</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Manders</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-15T12:50:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

