By Frank Slootman - 2014-02-04
I hope I live long enough to see the demise of e-mail. What makes me think it's going to die? Because it sucks! For those of us who are ‘Digital Immigrants’, folks old enough to remember the world without e-mail, how did we ever get by without it? E-mail hasn’t really been around that long, maybe 20 years?
Let’s face the facts: Working asynchronously through e-mail is appealing and easy. You can fire off a smoker any time you like, recipient present or not. That alone has ballooned the volume of messages by orders of magnitude. Then you add the ability to attach files and web links and we're off to the races!
Our notion of work has shifted – we are tethered to our inbox all day. We feel pretty busy and productive initiating and responding to messages all day long. But are we?
There are typically things better left out of e-mail. Any message that is contentious, controversial or challenging. No good is going to come of hitting ‘send’. Tempers are going to flare, misunderstandings galore, and feelings can be hurt. Then more messages are sent to try and undo the damage. And yet, now, social media communication is starting to eat e-mail alive. It takes many of the challenges of e-mail and squeezes them into 140 characters or less.
What about all of the e-mail strings currently in your inbox that could belong in systems? Threads that include requests, responses to requests and updates to the responses. These are all business processes executed in the realm of communications. Any time a thread starts repeating itself, it is a prime candidate to be captured in a workflow to structure, define and manage the work as a service.
Message repositories like inboxes are opaque. You have no idea what's going on in there. There are lots of trees, but no forest. You’re not managing services just merely trying to deliver them. We don't know how long it takes, how well it was done, what it costs, or how many of this type have been and are currently in progress.
Why are we even doing this? We are chasing our collective tails, feeling amazingly busy, with no idea how well we're doing. We can't scale, optimize and manage very well without systems. What options do we have to eliminate this traffic altogether?
IT organizations, by way of that 1990’s notion of a help desk, have some history running a service model with defined workflows. HR? Facilities? Procurement? E-mail them, and pray your message doesn't land in a junk folder. Often, they barely think of themselves as service domains – but therein lies an opportunity: The ability to deliver much better service at reduced cost.
As employees, we request and provide services all day. Just have a look at your mailbox. Providing services typically is considered ‘our job’ whereas we request services to help us do our jobs. Moving the requesting and delivery of services from e-mail to systems changes everything overnight. Systems don't forget…people do forget. Service delays are auto-escalated. Poor service performance shows up on reports. Sub-par service quality is alerted. Analytics highlight where we’re spending our collective time and resources. And with analytics we can easily plan and justify budgets. An opportunity to start managing services rather than just delivering them.
Next time you hit 'send', think about whether there might be a better, easier and cheaper way of accomplishing your goal for the message. What comes to mind?