Difference on number field on sys_watermark table default value
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
I found there is a difference in default value of number field of sys_watermark table. Both are at OOB version, when I changed it, it stopped evening receiving email on the instance. What does this difference mean? What configuration do I need to do to make it working such that email having same watermark in sub/body should be considered as Reply not new.
Working instance:
Instance with issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
I will try option 2
But I tried option 1, in this case email itself did not come in when I reverted to random padding
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Hey I tried both the approaches, in both cases if there is a new email (with re/fw) but have watermark, it is even not coming in the logs.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Can you check