- Post History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
7 hours ago
The Project Data Quality Index checks each project against 20 rules and gives it a rating. This article lists every rule, what it checks and the condition behind it, so you can see why a project scored the way it did and what to fix.
How scoring works
- Each rule is a pass or a fail, with no partial credit.
- Rules sit in six dimensions. A dimension's pass rate is the share of its rules that pass.
- Pass rates become a rating for each dimension and for the project overall.
- The rules are checked the same way every time. AI then explains the results and suggests what to improve.
|
Pass rate |
Rating |
|---|---|
|
85% to 100% |
Excellent |
|
70% to 84% |
Good |
|
55% to 69% |
Fair |
|
35% to 54% |
Poor |
|
0% to 34% |
Critical |
These are the defaults. Your admin can change them.
The ID is a rule's internal number, not a count. There are 20 rules, and some numbers are unused.
Example: a project scored
Here is a fictional project, "Customer Portal Upgrade", with its data partly filled in. Rule IDs are in brackets.
|
Dimension |
Rules passed |
Failed rules |
Pass rate |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Project Charter |
4 of 5 |
Business case is only 12 characters [3] |
80% |
Good |
|
Schedule & Milestones |
3 of 4 |
No milestone notes in 30 days [7] |
75% |
Good |
|
Resources & Team |
2 of 3 |
One unapproved assignment is past its start date [14] |
67% |
Fair |
|
Scope & Financials |
2 of 4 |
No expense lines [18], no monetary benefit plan [20] |
50% |
Poor |
|
Reporting & Activity |
3 of 3 |
None |
100% |
Excellent |
|
RIDAC Coverage |
1 of 1 |
None |
100% |
Excellent |
Overall: 15 of 20 rules pass (75%). With the default dimension weights, the overall rating would most likely be Good. AI makes the final call, so a project near a boundary could land on either side.
The AI also explains each rating and suggests where to start. For example (wording is illustrative):
Scope & Financials: Poor. The project has a budget but no recorded spending, and no monetary benefit plan, so cost control and the expected return can't be tracked. Suggested first step: add expense lines to start tracking actuals, then create a monetary benefit plan.
Fixing rules 18 and 20 would move Scope & Financials from 50% to 100% and lift the overall rating.
Project Charter
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Name is descriptive |
The name is at least 10 characters and isn't a placeholder. |
|
|
2 |
Description populated |
The description is at least 20 characters. |
|
|
3 |
Business case filled |
The business case has at least 30 characters. |
|
|
4 |
Investment type and class set |
Both are filled in. |
|
|
5 |
Scope description filled |
The in-scope description has at least 10 words. |
|
Schedule & Milestones
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
7 |
Milestone notes updated within 30 days |
A milestone has a note from the last 30 days. |
A |
|
8 |
Project baseline exists |
The project has a baseline. |
A |
|
9 |
Active milestones have owner |
Every unfinished milestone has an owner. |
Each milestone with |
|
10 |
Project manager assigned |
A project manager is set. |
|
Resources & Team
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
11 |
Active named resource assignment with future end date |
A named person is assigned and the assignment hasn't ended. |
A resource assignment with |
|
14 |
Unapproved stale resource assignments |
No assignment is both unapproved and past its dates. |
No assignment with |
|
15 |
Contractors have employment end date |
Every contractor has an end date on their profile. |
Each external assignment's profile has |
Scope & Financials
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
16 |
Approved budget set |
The budget is greater than zero. |
|
|
18 |
Actuals tracking started |
There is a budget and an expense line. |
|
|
19 |
Labor cost plan exists |
The project has a labor cost plan. |
A |
|
20 |
Monetary benefit plan exists |
The project has a monetary benefit plan. |
A |
Reporting & Activity
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
22 |
Status report created within 30 days |
A status report was created in the last 30 days. |
A |
|
24 |
Record actively maintained |
The project was updated in the last 30 days. |
|
|
25 |
Notes or comments added recently |
A note was added in the last 30 days on the project or related items. |
A |
RIDAC Coverage
RIDAC stands for risks, issues, decisions, actions and change requests.
|
ID |
Rule |
Passes when |
Technical condition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
26 |
At least one RIDAC item exists |
The project has any one of those items. |
A |
Point to Note
- After the rules run, AI explains each dimension’s rating in plain language, so you can see why a project scored the way it did. It also recommends what to fix first, starting with the failed rules that matter most.
- Small dimensions swing more. RIDAC has one rule, so it scores 0% or 100%. Each Charter rule is worth 20%.
- Nothing there often means a fail. Milestone, baseline and plan rules fail until a record exists. The contractor rule passes if the project has no contractors.
- Defaults can be changed. Your organization can add, change or turn off rules, so your scores may differ from the defaults described here. See the customization article for how. Tailor the Project Data Quality Index to your process: add, change and turn off rules