- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-26-2015 07:23 AM
More for curiosity than anything, but has anyone ever created a custom field on a table, then stripped out the "u_" that the system puts in place to denote that the field was user generated?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Scripting and Coding
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-26-2015 08:26 AM
If you could find a way to do so, I would advise against doing it. On the next upgrade, that field could get over written by mistake because it doesn't start with a 'u'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-26-2015 08:26 AM
If you could find a way to do so, I would advise against doing it. On the next upgrade, that field could get over written by mistake because it doesn't start with a 'u'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-26-2015 08:56 AM
Mmmm fair point. That could go south quick on accident.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-07-2017 07:43 AM
Hi,
Is this the same case with scoped applications. We have a scoped custom application and I notice the "u_" is removed before the column name.
Could this be a problem later being that it is a scoped application created in Studio?
Or is it OK to strip the "u_" in this case?
Thanks,
Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-07-2017 07:55 AM
Scoped apps do not use the u_ prefix but instead us their own namespace identifier.
