Is this the better summarised answer to this? Please comment.
Branch from the Flow-Logic “do-the-following-in-parallel” does not allows to create another “do-the-following-in-parallel” Flow-Logic by its design, does not matter the root of the flow is a main flow or even the sub-flow.
Whenever we need a parallel actions to execute from branch of another parallel branch(Flow-Logic “do-the-following-in-parallel”) , we must need to create another sub-flow.
In other word, to transition from one parallel branch to another parallel executions, we must need to create them as sub-flows. Will it be Kind of sub-flows hell :). This will kill the the visibility of the flow logic at the design time is I feel.
So far I have experience this restriction only on the Flow-Logic “do-the-following-in-parallel” . However the Flow-Logic like “IF” allows to have any numbers of next “IF” Flow-Logic branches on and on from the same flow. So we have the If logic visibility at the design level too.
This is the reason I always feel the FLOW designer is like (Story stepping flow) more of a linear flow designing … whereas the WORKFLOWS designer is more of flow charting in nature …
End of the day the workflows is the one providing the orchestration capabilities for advance/complex use cases .
Or… maybe my lack of knowledge yet on the SNOW platform … Right now I’m in kind of a knowledge hunting mode and I’m sure I have to start it from the beginning in some structured way after few weeks.
I appreciate the support from this community and they are really strong and prompt. Good to have a strong community support :). Tax
