Dell EMC & Powermax Storage Servers Discovery errors
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2024 09:15 AM
Hi All,
We are trying to discover Dell EMC Scv3020 servers through Data Collector servers and facing errors in Discovery as Classified Not Identified. The WBEM service is getting discovered successfully but somehow Servers are failing during Identification.
CMDB Identification Error: In payload missing minimum set of input values for criterion (matching) attributes from identify rule for table [cmdb_ci_storage_server]. Add these input values in payload
The same error is occurring for the Dell Powermax servers as well. Has anyone faced the similar issue? Any work around for the above error? Please advice.
I verified the CIM classify probe and the value is set as "Modern"- I found this solution in another post but we already have that set up.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-26-2024 10:32 AM
Hi,
Did you try to determine the identifier used:
- Navigate to Configuration > Identification/Reconciliation and click Identification Simulation.
- Click Start in the Start with Existing Payload tile.
- In the Source field, select the data source that is associated with this class update (ServiceNow for example).
- Paste the JSON payload into the empty canvas. Use the JSON payload returned in the error. Example payload:
- {"items": [{"className":"cmdb_ci_computer","values":{"discovery_source":"Manual Entry","name":"computerName","serial_number":"ABCXYZ123789"}}]}
- Click Execute to simulate processing of the payload by the identification engine.
- Review the output.
Update identifier:
- Navigate to Configuration > Identification/Reconciliation > CI Identifiers
- Search for the identifier used which returned the error.
- Update identifier to contain one identifier entry for one of the fields returned in the payload.
If you believe the solution provided has adequately addressed your query, could you please **mark it as 'Helpful'** and **'Accept it as a Solution'**? This will help other community members who might have the same question find the answer more easily.
Thank you for your consideration.
Selva