Design Catalog Items for Outcomes, Not Internal Processes

Matthew_13
Mega Sage

One of the most common challenges I see with Service Catalog adoption is that catalog items are often designed around internal team structures instead of user outcomes. Over time, this leads to confusion, misrouted requests, and a return to email or free-text tickets.

Where things usually go wrong

Catalog items often evolve like this:

  • Separate items for each support team or technology

  • Technical language that makes sense to IT, but not to users

  • Too many mandatory fields up front “just in case”

  • Routing logic embedded in user choices rather than automation

As a result, users struggle to select the “right” option, and fulfillment teams spend time correcting submissions instead of delivering value.

A more effective design mindset

Start with what the user wants to achieve, not how IT fulfills it.

Examples:

  • “Request access to a system” instead of “Active Directory Group Request”

  • “Report an issue with an application” instead of “Application Incident – Tier 2”

  • “Request new equipment” instead of separate laptop, desktop, and peripheral items

The internal complexity should live behind the scenes, handled by workflows, flows, and assignment rules.

Key design principles

  • One request, one outcome: Users should not need to understand internal ownership

  • Progressive disclosure: Ask for only what’s needed at submission; gather the rest later if required

  • Automated routing: Use category, service, CI, or logic to route—not user guesswork

  • Consistent language: Use business terms users recognize, not platform or team names

Benefits of this approach

  • Higher portal adoption

  • Fewer misrouted or incomplete requests

  • Faster fulfillment times

  • Cleaner reporting and easier maintenance

It also makes future changes easier—when teams or technologies change, you update the automation, not dozens of catalog items.

How this scales over time

This outcome-based approach works well across:

  • ITSM request fulfillment

  • HR and facilities requests

  • Employee onboarding/offboarding

  • Cloud, access, and equipment requests

It aligns naturally with service-based reporting and experience-focused metrics.

Key takeaway

A good catalog hides complexity instead of exposing it. When catalog items are designed around outcomes, users succeed faster and IT spends less time correcting mistakes.

 

Please give a Thumbs up if you find Helpful!!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Hemanth M1
Giga Sage

Hi @Matthew_13,


I see that many of these are questions. Could you create them as dev blogs?


If you don’t have access, please send an email to the ServiceNow community team.

 

 

 

Accept and hit Helpful if it helps.

Thank you,
Hemanth
Certified Technical Architect (CTA), ServiceNow MVP 2024, 2025

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5

@Simon Hendery No worries; put in a support escalation ticket with the Corporate Trust & Safety / Legal Compliance Team for you continuing to harass me. I gave you a warning and you continued. Next you will be notified with your next steps. Good luck!