Remediation Task - False positive/Reopen?

Miroslaw
Tera Contributor

Hi,

When I use "Mark as False Positive" button in Remediation Task, all associated VIs states got changed to Closed. 

RT status is Closed.

find_real_file.png

And if I use Reopen button in RT, Remediation Task status changes from Closed to Open, but all associated Vulnerable Items not. All Vis remain Closed. 

find_real_file.png

Is this behavior to be expected in SN? Can someone explain this?

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Chris McDevitt
ServiceNow Employee
ServiceNow Employee

Hi,

Take a look at the States:

https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/sandiego-security-management/page/product/vulnerability-response/concept/vulnerabillity-states.html

 

Basically, the intent is for a Scanner to "close" or "reopen" a VIT.  The Fase positive is a way to say that this is not an issue and to "Close it" regardless of what the Scanner thinks. Once a VIT is in a closed State, reopening a Group does not affect this State. 

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

Chris McDevitt
ServiceNow Employee
ServiceNow Employee

Hi,

Take a look at the States:

https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/sandiego-security-management/page/product/vulnerability-response/concept/vulnerabillity-states.html

 

Basically, the intent is for a Scanner to "close" or "reopen" a VIT.  The Fase positive is a way to say that this is not an issue and to "Close it" regardless of what the Scanner thinks. Once a VIT is in a closed State, reopening a Group does not affect this State. 

Hi @Chris McDevitt 

Thank you for clarifying

 

Hi @Chris McDevitt 

There is one thing I would like to ask.

When the user Reopen RT, all VIs remain Closed and RT status changes from Closed to Open.

What is the purpose of RT with Open status when all related VIs are Closed?

Hi,

I agree that this is not an optimal situation. There is not really a great use case to have the RT open and all the VITs Closed. I guess in theory a user could reopen an RT and manually add more VIT? I am not sure why they would want to do this but they could?