Micro-Certification - Welcome to ServiceNow task 3 is not getting pass
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
5 hours ago
Hi everyone,
I’m currently working on a ServiceNow lab task where I need to create an incident for intermittent email access and assign it to the Software group.
I have filled in all the required fields correctly:
Caller: Adela Cervantsz
Category/Subcategory: Email
Impact: 2 – Medium
Urgency: 2 – Medium
Assignment Group: Software
After submitting the incident, I also added the required comment in Additional Comments (customer visible) exactly as instructed.
However, the task is still showing as failed, and I’m unable to understand what I might be missing.
Has anyone faced a similar issue or knows what could be causing this? Any guidance would be really helpful.
Thanks in advance!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 hours ago
Here are the most likely reasons your task is still showing as failed:
1. Caller Name Spelling — Most Common Culprit
The caller you typed is "Adela Cervantsz" — check the lab instructions again very carefully. The actual user in the system is almost certainly "Adela Cervantes" (note: Cervantes not Cervantsz).
Labs validate against exact sys_id matches, so if the name autocomplete didn't resolve to a real user record and you typed a misspelling, the field may look filled but the reference is broken.
Check the Caller field — does it show as a blue hyperlink? If it's just plain text it didn't resolve to a valid user.
2. Comment vs Work Note Mix-up
Labs are very specific about which field the comment goes in. Verify:
- You used Additional Comments (customer visible) — the one on the right side of the activity section
- You did not accidentally type in Work Notes (the left side)
- The comment text matches the lab instruction exactly — including capitalisation, punctuation, and spacing
3. Short Description Field
Labs almost always require a specific short description word-for-word. Check if the lab instructions specify exact text for this field — something like "Intermittent email access" — and make sure yours matches exactly including capitalisation.
4. Incident Not Submitted Properly
Verify the incident was actually saved/submitted and has an INC number assigned. If you're still on the new record form it hasn't been committed yet.
5. Priority Calculated Correctly
With Impact 2 and Urgency 2 the system should auto-calculate Priority 2 – High. Some labs validate the priority field too — if your instance has a custom priority matrix this could differ.
Quick Checklist
| Field | Check |
|---|---|
| Caller | Blue hyperlink? Correct spelling? |
| Short Description | Matches lab text exactly? |
| Category | Email (not Software) |
| Subcategory | Correct sub-value? |
| Impact | 2 – Medium |
| Urgency | 2 – Medium |
| Assignment Group | Software (resolved as hyperlink) |
| Comment | In Additional Comments not Work Notes? |
| Record saved | INC number visible? |
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 hours ago - last edited 2 hours ago
