CMDB reconciliation rule priority conflict between SG-Intune and Qualys-CSAM for Hardware CI
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-24-2026 11:25 PM
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
1 REPLY 1
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-25-2026 06:39 AM
Hi @amp20
The first rule already includes both SG-Intune and Qualys-CSAM.
The second rule (Qualys-CSAM[200] alone) may be redundant unless:
it targets different attributes, or
you intentionally want Qualys to populate fields independently.
If both rules apply to All attributes on Hardware, then the second rule is usually unnecessary.
Recommended cleaner setup:
Rule 1:
SG-Intune[100], Qualys-CSAM[200]
Rule 2:
SNAssetManagement[300]
If the provided solution is useful/working, please Accept as Solution and hit the Helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Bharat Chavan
