We're reclaiming inactive PDIs to keep them available for active builders. Learn what's changing, who's affected, and how to protect your work. Read More

Tushar
Kilo Sage

We’ve been building workflows in ServiceNow for years so what makes “agentic” workflows different?


The key difference is this:

👉 Traditional workflows follow predefined paths
👉 Agentic systems decide the path dynamically


In older models:

  • You define every condition
  • You design every branch
  • You control every outcome

With agentic AI:

  • The system evaluates the situation
  • Chooses the right tools (flows, APIs, data)
  • Executes multiple steps on its own
  • Adjusts if something fails

This is where things get interesting.


For example:

Instead of routing an incident → assigning → waiting

An agent could:

  • Diagnose the issue
  • Check historical fixes
  • Trigger remediation
  • Update the ticket automatically

All without strict scripting for each step.

This doesn’t replace workflows, but it builds on top of them.

As developers, our role shifts from:
👉 Designing every step
to
👉 Designing the environment and guardrails

That’s a mindset change worth thinking about.

Version history
Last update:
‎03-31-2026 04:13 AM
Updated by:
Contributors