Tushar
Kilo Sage

We’ve been building workflows in ServiceNow for years so what makes “agentic” workflows different?


The key difference is this:

👉 Traditional workflows follow predefined paths
👉 Agentic systems decide the path dynamically


In older models:

  • You define every condition
  • You design every branch
  • You control every outcome

With agentic AI:

  • The system evaluates the situation
  • Chooses the right tools (flows, APIs, data)
  • Executes multiple steps on its own
  • Adjusts if something fails

This is where things get interesting.


For example:

Instead of routing an incident → assigning → waiting

An agent could:

  • Diagnose the issue
  • Check historical fixes
  • Trigger remediation
  • Update the ticket automatically

All without strict scripting for each step.

This doesn’t replace workflows, but it builds on top of them.

As developers, our role shifts from:
👉 Designing every step
to
👉 Designing the environment and guardrails

That’s a mindset change worth thinking about.

Version history
Last update:
an hour ago
Updated by:
Contributors