- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 04:35 PM
Hi Guys,
I have a catalog item with variables and variable sets in it. My catalog item, for example is named DevTools. I have a variable inside the variable set (which DevTools uses). It's name is application_profile. Below is my existing query:
var grCompletedRitms = new GlideRecord('sc_req_item');
grCompletedRitms.addActiveQuery();
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('approval', 'approved');
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('cat_item.name', 'DevTools');
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('quantity', 1);
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('state', 3);
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('variables.application_profile', '!=', '303');
grCompletedRitms.query();
My query doesn't seem to work. It still returns the rows including which the application_profile is 303. May I ask the correct way and the best practice of doing it? Thanks in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Best Practices
-
Scripting and Coding
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 05:53 PM
Hi Johndel,
Using GlideRecord to Query Tables 3.6 Querying Service Catalog Tables reads:
You cannot directly query the variables of the Service Catalog Request Item table [sc_req_item]. Instead, query the Variable Ownership table [sc_item_option_mtom] by adding two queries, one for the variable name and another for the value. The query returns the many-to-many relationship, which you can dot-walk to the requested item. The following example finds the request items that have the variable named 'item_name' with a value of 'item_value' and displays the request item numbers:
and provides this example:
var gr = new GlideRecord('sc_item_option_mtom');
gr.addQuery('sc_item_option.item_option_new.name','item_name');
gr.addQuery('sc_item_option.value','item_value');
gr.query();
while (gr.next()) {
gs.addInfoMessage(gr.request_item.number);
}
Hope this helps.
Please feel free to connect, follow, mark helpful / answer, like, endorse.
John Chun, PhD PMP ![]() | ![]() |

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 05:16 PM
Did you miss the comma just in the copy paste or in the real code?
grCompletedRitms.addQuery('variables.application_profile', '!=', '303');
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 05:21 PM
Thanks for the correction! But still, same result mate.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 05:43 PM
I knew it couldn't be that easy...
You may need to do a call on the variables in a separate GR.
For example:
var gr = new GlideRecord('sc_item_option_mtom');
gr.addQuery('sc_item_option.item_option_new.name','application_profile');
gr.addQuery('sc_item_option.value','!=','303');
gr.query();
The returned records would have a gr.request_item.number where the number is a requested item whose variable application profile does not have value 303.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-07-2016 05:50 PM
So, it can't be dot-walked? I was thinking of using a .addJoinQuery() for variable ownerships, options, and variables table. But i was hoping if there's a way to do a dot-walk. Thanks.