- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-04-2016 12:14 PM
I have created a new role and havent assigned anyone to that role. In the ACL of my table, i added the newly created role in the "Create Access" part. I removed the default role which has been created as well..
Q1:In this case when i go to my actual table data, i still see the new option over there.. I m d admin for my instance.. So does it show "New" option for me? But it shouldnt be.. Rit? Since only the members of newly created role should see the "New" option.. Right
Q2:
I have around 10 tables(9 Admin related tables and then one main form) for my application. When i created those tables, automatic ACL;s with the default role has been added. Now should i have go to individual ACL's in each table and have to add the newly created roles? Or do we have any better process of doing it?
Solved! Go to Solution.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-04-2016 04:47 PM
Hi Kailash,
In this case it is visible as table is not restriced based on role. I just hopped to your instance and I see there is no role assigned.
Can you please assign role and test once.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-07-2016 01:04 PM
only two people can edit the record.. if the record is created by Person A or Person A has been listed as "Developer" in that record..
So for the developer condition i used as Developer is dynamic (me).,. for created by i use the condition as created by is javascript:gs.getUserID()..
I did testing now.. if Person A is specfied as "Developer" in that record even though it is created by someone, Person A can be able to edit the record without any issues.
Bt Person A is not able to edit the record which he has created.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-07-2016 01:20 PM
Use javascript:gs.getUserName() instead of gs.getUserID(). You are good to go
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-07-2016 01:35 PM