Unterschiede zwischen Legacy Studio und ServiceNow Studio aus der Xanadu-Version.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2025 07:58 PM
I would like to know the differences between the legacy Studio and the ServiceNow Studio released with the Xanadu version.
From my research, I believe that ServiceNow Studio has the following features.
-Cross-scope editing
-Navigation panel for searching and categorizing
-Code generation completion with Now Assist
-Switching update sets
-Publishing to app repository
-Access to integration builder
Based on these, what did you do in the legacy Studio but can no longer do, and what did you do that you can now do but In light of this, we would like to know what was done in legacy Studio but is no longer possible, and what was not done but can now be done.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2025 09:32 PM
Hi @SotaT ,
here's a detailed comparison between the Legacy ServiceNow Studio and the New ServiceNow Studio introduced in the Xanadu release.
🧾 Legacy Studio vs. New Studio (Xanadu) – Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Feature / Capability Legacy Studio New Studio (Xanadu) Notes
Cross-Scope Editing | ❌ Not supported directly | ✅ Fully supported | Allows editing across multiple application scopes seamlessly. |
Code Auto-Completion (Now Assist) | ❌ Not available | ✅ Available | AI-powered code suggestions to expedite development. |
Tag-Based Navigation Panel | ❌ Traditional tree view | ✅ Smart categories & filters | Enhanced navigation with categorized and searchable panels. |
Switching Update Sets | ✅ Direct from top bar | ✅ Integrated, less prominent | Functionality remains, integrated within the new UI. |
Publish to App Repository | ❌ External navigation required | ✅ Integrated within Studio | Simplifies the process of publishing applications. |
Integration Builder Access | ❌ Must exit to Flow Designer | ✅ Available inside Studio | Centralized access to build and manage integrations. |
Git / Source Control Integration | 🔸 Basic support | ✅ Improved UX, tighter GitHub sync | Enhanced version control capabilities. |
Error Detection (AI-based) | ❌ Manual debugging | ✅ AI flags issues in real-time | Real-time error detection to improve code quality. |
Old-style File Type Filtering | ✅ Direct dropdown filters | ❌ Uses broader navigation/search | Filtering by file type requires using the new navigation system. |
Lightweight, Fast Loading UI | ✅ Yes | ❌ Heavier due to AI & widgets | New features may impact loading times. |
Low-Code / Citizen Dev Friendliness | ❌ Primarily for developers | ✅ Unified for low-code & pro-code | Supports a broader range of developers. |
Classic Module Tree Navigation | ✅ Expandable, left-hand style | ❌ Replaced by new layout | Traditional navigation replaced with modern UI. |
Real-Time Collaboration / Multi-User Dev View | ❌ No awareness of other devs | ✅ Collaboration capabilities via DevOps | Facilitates teamwork in development processes. |
Scoped App File Management | ✅ Simple file listing | ✅ Enhanced with tags & categorization | Improved organization of application files. |
Built-in Access to Flow Designer, Tables, ACLs | ❌ Access via separate modules | ✅ Connected through side panel | Streamlined access to essential development tools. |
Modern UX (Dark mode, collapsible panes) | ❌ Basic UI only | ✅ Yes, modern interface | Enhanced user experience with modern design elements. |
🧩 Summary Matrix
What You Lost in New Studio What You Gained in New Studio
Classic module tree style | Now Assist AI suggestions |
Simpler UI (lightweight loading) | Cross-scope editing |
Quick file type filters | AI-based error detection |
Minimalist approach | Integration Builder built-in |
Fast load on slow internet | Tag-based categorized file navigation |
Old-school update set toggle panel | Direct Git integration |
Basic interface | Unified low-code + pro-code environment |