Guidance: GRC Workspace Page Variant Architecture & Multi-BU RAM Strategy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago - last edited 3 weeks ago
Hi Community,
As an alternative to the my other question of using custom workspaces as a solution;
We would like to seek inputs/advice on using page variants as an alternative option when adding a new BU to share the GRC workspace under the same instance.
Another team in my organisation has configured / setup the workspace before hand and tailored it to their BU's requirements.
[Current Context]
Workspaces/Roles:
BU #1 has setup first in the instance and currently configured GRC: Risk Management Workspace across the three default roles/audiences (Business Op-Risk Manager, IT Risk Manager, Operational Risk Manager).- Entity Hierarchy:
BU #1 has defined and set the Root Entity Class with it mapped to a default RAM (RAM_A).
Organizationally, the new BU (BU #2) which we are trying to add is the parent of BU #1 and oversees multiple child departments that may require future RAM variants in future.
- RAM:
BU #1 has configure the RAM to their needs and set it to the root Entity class.
A new RAM will need to be added to BU #2, both BU's do not share the RAMs.
[Questions / Challenge]
Q1. Role & Page Variant Strategy
To onboard BU #2 onto the same instance / GRC workspace, should we be:
- Adding custom roles/audience under global scope for Page Variants to work in the GRC: Risk Management Workspace?
- How do we best structure variant ordering and audiences to prevent routing collisions?
The default roles/audiences for the risk workspace is "taken" by BU #1:
1. Business Op-Risk Managers
2. IT risk manager
3. Operational risk manager
Is the correct approach to add/create custom roles under global scope for BU #2
(So that the variants will work and both BUs can be segmented?)
Proposed new roles/audiences to be created:
4. Business op-risk manager #2
5. Operational risk-manager #2
6. IT risk manager #2
Q2. Entity Class Hierarchy Restructuring
BU #1 has set the Root Entity Class with it configured to their RAM (RAM_A).
What is the best practice for re-parenting BU #1 under a new BU #2 Root Entity Class without invalidating active risk assessments or scoring configurations?
Q3. Multi-RAM Architecture
How should Entity Classes and Risk Assessment Methodologies (RAMs) be structured so BU #2 and its future sub-departments can run distinct RAMs independently alongside BU #1?
Thank you, in advance for your guidance!
