- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-11-2020 11:42 AM
When we Discover a Cisco Stacked Switch, it does not create 1 CI for each switch in stack, but 1 CI, with information about the other switches in stack. Our network team would like to have 1 CI for each with a hardware relationship showing how they are in a single stack. They want each switch in the stack to have a unique serial number.
Is this possible with out-of-the-box Discovery functionality?
I've done some research, but not finding anything useful for us.
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Discovery
- 6,394 Views
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2020 12:40 AM
Hi Dave,
Is the Stacked Switch pattern enabled? Are you using probes or patterns?
Thanks,
Ashutosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2025 07:32 AM
Hi,
Using CISCO Catalyst ServiceNow App we are still struggling with the issue detailed by @David77 regarding Stack Switches : they still appear concatenated in ServiceNow CMDB with serial numbers as information.
Any ideas?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-07-2025 05:43 AM
Sorry, I don't know of any plans or roadmaps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Saturday
Good question. We're just now installing and testing Cisco Catalyst in a sub-prod.
I'll keep you posted.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2020 12:40 AM
Hi Dave,
Is the Stacked Switch pattern enabled? Are you using probes or patterns?
Thanks,
Ashutosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2020 08:05 AM
Ashutosh, good question! We were using probes/sensors, but we just did the migration to Patterns in a non-PROD, using Orlando. WHAT AN IMPROVEMENT!
Patterns sees each device in the stack ... unfortunately, it labels some as "slaves", where I'd prefer it say "secondary"/
Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2024 08:01 AM
Yes and Yes.
