I'd appreciate some clarification between the priority field on the reconciliation definitions tables and order field on data precedence table in the IRE application. They seem to be doing the same thing, giving preference to what data source can update the cmdb.
If i have multiple data sources, and i specify different priorities in their reconciliation definitions, is it necessary to still create data precedence records?
This is my understanding. In Paris release priority is determined by Reconciliation rules. Reconciliation rules work with data refresh rules. Priority is rolled in to recon rules in Paris.
Paris
In Orlando / New York it is different. that is data precedence and recon rules are diff and you need to define priority separately in data precedence rules
So there shouldn't be a situation where priority in recon rules should conflict with priority in data precedence
Please mark helpful or accept solution so that it helps others with a similar question
This is my understanding. In Paris release priority is determined by Reconciliation rules. Reconciliation rules work with data refresh rules. Priority is rolled in to recon rules in Paris.
Paris
In Orlando / New York it is different. that is data precedence and recon rules are diff and you need to define priority separately in data precedence rules
So there shouldn't be a situation where priority in recon rules should conflict with priority in data precedence
Please mark helpful or accept solution so that it helps others with a similar question
