RITM state and stage
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Is there any official ServiceNow documentation that defines the standard State and Stage combinations for Requests (REQ) and Requested Items (RITM) when multiple Catalog Tasks (SCTASK) are associated with a single RITM?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Hi,
There is no official ServiceNow documentation that defines standard State and Stage combinations for REQ or RITM when multiple SCTASKs are involved. REQ, RITM, and SCTASK states are not automatically synchronized unless explicitly configured
For additional reference, the following community discussion explains the OOTB behavior and best practices around REQ/RITM state handling:
https://www.servicenow.com/community/sysadmin-forum/what-is-the-best-practice-or-guidance-on-the-sta...
If this helps, please give a like and mark it as a solution
Thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
I looked into this and wanted to share a quick clarification on how State and Stage work for REQ, RITM, and SCTASK in ServiceNow.
There isn’t a strict standard or official mapping for how State and Stage should behave when multiple catalog tasks are tied to a single RITM. It mainly depends on how the flow or workflow is designed.
In general, the way it works is pretty straightforward:
- The actual work is done at the Catalog Task(SCTASK) level
- The RITM stays open until all its tasks are completed
- Once all tasks are done, the RITM gets closed (complete or incomplete depending on the outcome)
- And finally, the Request (REQ) closes after all RITMs under it are completed
The Stage field is mostly used just to show progress (like Approval, Fulfillment, Complete), and it can be customized based on the implementation.
So overall, it’s more about the flow logic driving everything rather than a fixed state/stage structure.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Hi @bhakti2
No, there is no defined standard, as state and stages are configurable according to your setup and according to the single company processes.
If my answer has helped with your question, please mark my answer as the accepted solution and give a thumbs up.
Best regards
Anders
Rising star 2024
MVP 2025
linkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andersskovbjerg/
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 weeks ago
Hi @bhakti2
There’s no predefined standard for the State and Stage of RITM, SCTASK, and REQ.
It’s important to define a project-level standard; otherwise, excessive custom entries and unnecessary customization will accumulate in the system.
Rule of thumb:
- Keep State limited and controlled
- Use Stage for customization instead of adding new states
Without a defined model:
- Teams start adding custom states/stages
- Duplicate meanings appear (e.g., “In Progress”, “Work in Progress”, “Ongoing”)
- Reporting becomes inconsistent
- Maintenance becomes difficult
You can refer: Request Management States and Stages Best Practice?
