- Post History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 hours ago
A 6-Step Framework for Now Assist Consumption Forecasting
A structured approach to planning AI consumption with confidence — from entitlement baseline to growth modeling
By Neha Agrawal · Product Manager – AI Platform · February 2026
Why Forecasting Matters Now
AI adoption in the enterprise is accelerating faster than most organizations anticipated. As teams move from pilots to production — and from one use case to many — the ability to plan and forecast AI consumption confidently has become one of the most valuable skills a partner or platform team can offer.
Across customer deployments, four themes consistently surface when consumption doesn't go as planned:
| 🔁 Agentic Workflow Misconfiguration A single AI Agent with a bad trigger configuration can consume hundreds of assists in minutes. |
🧪 Testing Without Consumption Monitoring Teams build and iterate in sub-production without realizing every test burns real assists from the same pool as production. |
| 🗄️ Cloned Production Data + Scheduled Jobs Cloning an instance for testing can expose an entire incident backlog to a scheduled GenAI job. |
✅ Unmonitored Proof-of-Concept Someone activates a skill to explore it — and nobody's watching the consumption dashboard. |
The common thread: a forecasting gap. None of these situations are the result of bad intent — they happen when teams are moving fast and AI capabilities are expanding quickly. The 6-step framework in this article helps close that gap, giving customers, partners, and platform teams a structured approach to plan consumption with confidence.
Customers, partners, implementation consultants, architects, and platform owners working with Now Assist. Whether scoping an initial deployment or expanding existing AI coverage, this framework applies at every stage.
The 6-Step Forecasting Framework
Six steps, six words. Each builds on the previous to produce a consumption forecast tied to business value — something you can bring to stakeholders with confidence.
Click any step below to expand details.
|
1
|
VALUE
The GenAI Value Equation
|
Start every forecasting engagement here — not with assist counts, but with the value question. This framework, adapted from MIT Sloan professor Rama Ramakrishnan, anchors the conversation on what AI actually delivers.
AI delivers value when:
- Time & effort doing the task without AI > time to set up + time using AI + time to review outputs
- AND the quality level meets business requirements
- AND risk tolerance aligns with the use case
The practical output is an efficiency ratio — a way to reframe assist consumption as time recovered:
| Efficiency Ratio | What It Means | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 10:1 + | Strong ROI — AI dramatically reduces effort | Prioritize for early adoption |
| 5:1 – 10:1 | Solid ROI — clear time savings, reasonable review | Good candidate for rollout |
| 2:1 – 5:1 | Moderate ROI — review effort is more significant | Optimize prompts/quality first |
- Without AI: 8,000 × 5 min manual effort = 667 hours/month
- With AI: 95% quick review (30 sec) + 5% light edit (2–3 min) = ~76 hours/month
- Time recovered: ~590 hours/month | Efficiency ratio: 8:1
Adapted from: Ramakrishnan, R. "A Practical Guide to Gaining Value From LLMs." MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter 2025.
|
2
|
BASELINE
Establish Your Entitlement Baseline
|
Know your starting point before building any forecast. Three questions to answer:
- How many assists did the customer purchase?
- How many have they already consumed?
- When is the contract anniversary date?
| Where to look | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Subscription Management → Account Level Entitlements → Now Assist Usage | Total purchased vs. allocated assists across all instances (account level) |
| AI Agent Analytics in AI Agent Studio → Assist Consumption tab | Instance-level agentic workflow consumption, near real-time |
- Now Assist measurement transitioned from a rolling 365-day look-back to a 365-day burn-down model tied to the contract anniversary date
- Unused assists are forfeited at reset — no rollover
- The contract anniversary date is now the anchor for all consumption planning
|
3
|
MAPPING
Map Current & Planned AI Use Cases
|
Inventory every AI skill and agent active in production, plus planned use cases for upcoming rollouts, and map each to its consumption category.
| Category | Example Skills | Assists |
|---|---|---|
| GenAI Skills | Summarization (incident, case, etc.) / Resolution Note Generation | 1 |
| Knowledge Article Generation | 10 | |
| Conversational AI (NAVA) | Now Assist Panel Conversation | 5 |
| Virtual Agent Topic | 10 | |
| Voice Agent Conversation | 50 | |
| AI Agents | Small workflow (<4 actions) | 25 |
| Medium workflow (5–8 actions) | 50 | |
| Large workflow (9–20 actions) | 150 | |
| Builder Tools | Experience (UI) Generation | 1,000 |
| App / Playbook Generation | 2,500 |
- Select Now Assist skills now activate automatically when installing or upgrading plugins
- Check Now Assist Admin Console after any upgrade to review which skills were auto-activated
- Verify scheduled job filter conditions before upgrading sub-production environments with cloned data
Reference the published Now Assist FAQs for the latest assists-per-action values across all skill types.
|
4
|
ESTIMATE
Calculate Baseline Consumption
|
Apply the formula to each use case separately, then sum:
Three things to keep in mind:
- Volume: Pull from ServiceNow Performance Analytics — don't guess. Estimate projected use cases from source systems or stakeholder input.
- Adoption: Model as a range, not a single number. Adoption depends on enablement, not just availability.
- Approach: Calculate GenAI Skills and AI Agents separately — they have fundamentally different consumption patterns.
- GenAI Skills: 5,000 incidents × 70% × 1 = 3,500 | 1,000 problems × 50% × 1 = 500 | 500 KB articles × 30% × 10 = 1,500 → Subtotal: 5,500
- AI Agents: 5,000 incidents × 20% routed × 25 assists → Subtotal: 25,000
- Total baseline: 30,500 assists/month — AI Agents represent 82% of consumption despite handling only 20% of volume
This pattern — where AI Agents drive the majority of consumption even at lower volume — is consistent across implementations. The single most important question to ask: "What percentage of tickets do you want AI to handle autonomously versus assist humans?"
|
5
|
BUFFER
Budget for Development & Testing
|
This is the most commonly missed factor in forecasting. Sub-production environments draw from the same account-level assist pool as production.
Common sources of sub-production consumption:
- Prompt Refinement Iterations
- Agentic Evaluations
- UAT Cycles with Realistic Data
- Developer Experimentation
- Scheduled Job Testing
The right buffer depends on implementation complexity. Use your own trending data as the best guide — measure during the initial pilot, compare sub-prod vs. production ratios, and refine continuously.
- Review which skills will auto-activate before upgrading
- Verify filter conditions exclude historical/cloned data (e.g., Created >= activation date)
- Consider reducing scheduled job frequency in sub-prod
- Monitor
sys_gen_ai_usage_logdaily during initial testing phases - Check Now Assist Admin Console after any upgrade for auto-activated skills
|
6
|
SCALE
Model Growth Over Time
|
Don't use a flat multiplier. Consumption grows as adoption increases and use cases expand. Think in adoption phases — and build three scenarios with stakeholders:
| Phase | Characteristics | Consumption Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Focused Rollout | Limited user groups, controlled use cases, heavy testing | May spike unpredictably; sub-production often dominates |
| 2 · Planned Expansion | Broader rollout, established guardrails, AI Agents added incrementally | Steady, measurable growth aligned to change management |
| 3 · Full Scale | Org-wide access, multiple AI Agents, AI embedded in daily workflows | High sustained consumption with seasonal variations |
- 50% consumed: Check in — review adoption trajectory and upcoming use cases
- 75% consumed: Plan ahead — assess whether current pace aligns with entitlement
- 90% consumed: Begin expansion conversations with your account team
Framework in Action: Sentiment Analysis Scenario
The following example applies the full 6-step framework to a single use case. Numbers below are illustrative — your actual results will depend on your specific configuration, entitlement, and rollout approach. In practice, you would calculate each skill separately and combine for a total forecast.
Large Healthcare System
Applying the 6-step framework to Now Assist Sentiment Analysis for ITSM
|
25,000
Monthly incidents
|
300
Service desk agents
|
1.5M
Annual assist entitlement
|
|
1
|
VALUE
Sentiment Analysis Value Equation
990 hours recovered/month · 29:1 efficiency ratio · Quality and risk conditions met
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
BASELINE
Entitlement Context
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
MAPPING
Use Case Identification
Configuration opportunity: adjust filter scope from "all active" to "updated last 24 hrs"
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
ESTIMATE
Consumption Calculation
Optimized: 25,000 incidents × 100% adoption × 1 assist, filtered to last 24 hours, once daily = 25,000 assists/month
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
BUFFER
Sub-Production Allocation
Adjusted monthly baseline: 27,500 assists
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
SCALE
Growth Projections
Growth comes from incident volume increases, expanding to CSM cases, or building custom sentiment skills for other record types.
Summary: 29:1 efficiency ratio · 25K monthly production · 27.5K with buffer · 300K annual (steady state) · 20% of 1.5M entitlement
|
Key Takeaways
| The biggest risk isn't overconsumption — it's underconsumption Under the burn-down model, unused assists are forfeited at the contract anniversary. A well-structured forecast helps customers use what they've purchased and realize the value they've invested in. | The framework's value isn't the forecast — it's the knowledge Adoption will evolve. New use cases will emerge. The six steps give you a diagnostic tool to understand consumption patterns and course-correct with confidence. | Your judgment is the added value The platform gives customers powerful tools. What they need from you is judgment — which use cases to prioritize, how to configure them, and when to scale. That's the trusted advisor role. |
Resources
| 📋 Now Assist Overview (Rate Card) | 🤖 AI Agents FAQ & Troubleshooting |
| 🔄 Loop Prevention Guide | ✅ Agentic Evaluations Guide |
| 📊 Now Assist Analytics FAQ |
Views are my own, and do not represent my team, employer, partners, or customers.
- 30 Views
