Naomi La
ServiceNow Employee
Options
- Post History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
an hour ago - edited an hour ago
|
See what matters most with the new Platform Health Score
Serious findings count more. Minor ones count less.
|
|
|
1000+
Definitions, up from 300+ in the previous scoring model
0–100
Score scale
Your initial score may increase or decrease.
The scoring method and definition coverage have changed. This reflects a new methodology, not a decline in platform health.
|
|
Overview
What's happening
|
|
We're upgrading the Platform Health Score to reflect risk more accurately. The new risk-weighted scoring model weights findings by severity, category, and impact, so your highest-value remediation work moves the score in proportion to the risk you address.
|
|
The Platform Health Score measures platform health using definitions evaluated by the Scan Engine. It turns 1000+ definitions into one score from 0 to 100, so you can see where your risk sits and what to address first.
|
|
|
What's changing
Why the score is changing
|
|
The previous scoring model had three important limitations. It treated all findings equally, could change when new definitions were introduced, and could produce differences between Full and Delta Scan results because the scans covered different scopes. The new Platform Health Score addresses these limitations through risk weighting and scope-aware calculation.
|
|
|
Our approach
Why we're doing this
|
|
|
What to expect
Your score may change initially
|
|
|
How to read your score under the new risk-weighted scoring model
|
|
• Treat your initial score under the new risk-weighted scoring model as your baseline
• Prioritize fixes by impact, because high-risk fixes tend to move your score the most
• Report progress to leadership with a more risk-aware view of platform health
|
|
A detailed guide to interpreting your score is attached at the bottom of this article.
|
|
How it works
How the score is calculated
|
|
|
Example data
What each fix is worth
|
|
Example data
Platform Health Score after each remediation path (0–100)
Illustrative example: a 10-definition library that starts at a score of 21. Six Security fixes add 41 points. 190 UX fixes add 2. Your results will differ.
|
|
Next steps
What you need to do
|
|
|
Reading your score
Read your score, then act
|
|
|
Scores run from 0 to 100. The new risk-weighted scoring model uses three bands: Good, Needs attention, and At risk. The previous scoring model used four: At Risk (0–70), Fair (70–80), Good (80–90), and Excellent (90–100). Because the two models use different scoring methods, compare scores within the same model rather than across models.
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
|
|
Go deeper
Product documentation
|
| Learn more about the Platform Health Score |
|
Additional Resources: An Overview guide, Detailed customer guide and Comprehensive FAQ are attached at the bottom of this article.
|
Labels:
