- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2024 07:23 AM
Hi Everyone,
We are using Remote file import to fetch the csv file from Mid-server and processing the record to update user table. It stopped working after washington upgrade. Getting the below error.
var remoteFileImport = new CSMIDServerRemoteFileImport();
remoteFileImport.getRemoteFileAndUploadToInstance()
Root cause of JavaScriptException: java.lang.IllegalAccessException
Any lead will be really helpful.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2024 07:45 AM
Update the MID server Wrapper file with Below 2 line
in file --- agent/conf/wrapper.conf file
---------------------- Below 2 line add --------------------------------------
wrapper.java.additional.201=--add-opens=java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https=ALL-UNNAMED
wrapper.java.additional.202=--add-opens=java.base/sun.net.www.http=ALL-UNNAMED
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2024 10:44 AM
Hello! Same issue here. We've tried all these steps, sadly no-go. We are getting an ECC queue error on the input, but the output is "processed." However, there are no changes to records we are updating. Error details below:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-02-2024 07:04 AM - edited 10-02-2024 07:05 AM
Does anyone have more knowledge about what exactly these parameters are doing? Can there be any negative sides to it, security wise?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-07-2024 05:43 AM
I'd also be interested to know more about any particular security implications to configuring this workaround for ALL-UNNAMED. Seems like it could increases the attack surface and potentially expose critical implementation details that should remain protected. Is it possible to open access to specific libraries only instead of ALL-UNNAMED, per above?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-03-2025 10:37 AM - edited 06-03-2025 10:37 AM
I'm still wondering why this wasn't or isn't a native option of ServiceNow
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2025 07:58 AM
I couldn't agree more. Given that it's clearly possible, it seems odd that ServiceNow wouldn't provide this as an option.