Dynamic CI group VS manual map

pratiksha5
Mega Sage

I have instance where they are able to populate cmdb_ci_appl table from a integration. Which gives the information about the application and its dependent or related CI (in relations).

 

Now we are trying to build CSDM model for them. Presently they do not have service mapping. I think what all we need is already part of the application table. 

 

Now, in the application the relation are their for prod, test, acceptance. So I can not directly use manual mapping as it will map all the CI under one application service. 

 

I am planning to create cmdb group by  carefully groping CI based on naming convention. I am getting the correct list of CI per environment.

 

Now, when while creating dynamic ci group I am getting two options at the top, view CMDB group ci & view CMDB service CI. The group CI shows the correct list. However the service CI shows all the environment and avoiding all the conditions I have given in the query. 

 

@CMDB Whisperer 

0 REPLIES 0