Default Assumptions: How AI Reinforces Gender Bias
Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and other conversational AI systems are often perceived a neutral, factual, and unbiased. Yet, when we look closely at how these systems respond to seemingly simple questions, a subtle but important problem emerges.
AI often makes assumptions the user never intended.
This became clear to me while testing multiple AI assistants with straightforward, gender-neutral questions and observing how consistently they defaulted to male-centric answers.
I asked an AI:
“Who is the footballer with the most international goals?”
The response was immediate and confident: Cristiano Ronaldo.
But here’s the issue. I never specified men’s football.
The factual answer is Christine Sinclair, who has scored 190 international goals, more than Cristiano Ronaldo.
This wasn’t a trick question. It was a default assumption.
Another Example, Same Pattern
I then asked:
“Who was the first Indian to take 100 wickets in T20?”
Once again, the AI responded with a male cricketer.
The correct answer, however, is Deepti Sharma, who reached the milestone in international cricket before any Indian male player.
Two different sports. Two different AI agents. Same underlying bias.
What’s Really Going On?
This isn’t about one incorrect answer. It’s about how AI decides what “default” means.
Large language models are trained on vast amounts of historical data including news coverage, articles, social media, and public records. This data reflects long-standing inequalities in visibility and representation.
Men’s achievements, especially in sports, are documented and repeated far more frequently than women’s. As a result, AI systems learn to associate certain roles and accomplishments with men, even when the question itself is gender neutral.
Popularity bias further amplifies this issue. AI assistants are optimized to provide answers users are least likely to question. Well-known male athletes are more familiar, more searchable, and more commonly referenced than equally accomplished women.
The outcome is an illusion of accuracy. The answer sounds right because it feels familiar, not because it is complete.
What makes this especially concerning is not just that AI can be wrong, but that it can be confidently wrong. When AI responds with certainty, users are far less likely to pause or challenge the result.
Where Change Actually Begins
AI does not exist in a vacuum. It learns from us, from our history, and from what we choose to highlight and repeat. When AI defaults to male answers for gender-neutral questions, it is reflecting the gaps we have allowed to exist for decades.
But reflection does not have to mean acceptance.
Real change starts with awareness. It continues when we slow down, question confident answers, and notice who is missing from them. It grows when builders design systems that prioritize completeness over familiarity, and when users remain curious rather than passive.
As AI becomes more embedded in how we learn, work, and make decisions, it becomes even more important that we do not hand over our judgment along with our trust.
Technology can help surface knowledge, but responsibility still belongs to people. The future of AI will not be shaped by algorithms alone. It will be shaped by the choices we make today and the questions we are willing to ask when something feels like the obvious answer.
.
.
If you found this article useful or thought-provoking, please consider marking it as Helpful. Your feedback helps others discover the discussion.
I’ve also shared this article on LinkedIn, where I continue to write about AI, technology, and real-world observations from using these tools.
👉 You can read the LinkedIn version here:
Read the article on LinkedIn
If these topics interest you, feel free to connect or follow me on LinkedIn to stay in touch.
