Connection record not tracked in update set.

Afsar2
Tera Contributor

Hi guys,

I noticed that Connection record are not tracked in update set.

I have also tried "Force to update set" but this particular record is not tracked.

I believe as there is a reference to Credentials, that could be a reason for this. But I could find any official doc on this topic.

Note: I was able to track "Connection and Credential Aliases".

Any suggestions on this?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

shloke04
Kilo Patron

Hi @Afsar 

Connection records are data records only and Data records are not captured in an Update set. please refer to article below:

Refer the link here for more details which says clearly about what is captured and not:

https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/rome-application-development/page/build/system-update-sets/reference/customizations-tracked-update-sets.html

There are two ways to handle this:

1) Either this need to be moved as a XML by exporting from Source instance and then importing it back in Target.

2) There is a SN Util feature name as "Add to Update Set" which I find it very handy for these scenario and can capture any data change as well along with updates . Please refer the link below for downloading it:

https://developer.servicenow.com/connect.do#!/share/contents/9824957_add_to_update_set_utility?t=PRODUCT_DETAILS

Let me know if you have a follow up query.

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

View solution in original post

14 REPLIES 14

Community Alums
Not applicable

Hi Afsar,

Glad to see my answer helped you, Kindly mark the answer as Correct & Helpful both and close this thread.

Thanks,
Sandeep

shloke04
Kilo Patron

Hi @Afsar 

Connection records are data records only and Data records are not captured in an Update set. please refer to article below:

Refer the link here for more details which says clearly about what is captured and not:

https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/rome-application-development/page/build/system-update-sets/reference/customizations-tracked-update-sets.html

There are two ways to handle this:

1) Either this need to be moved as a XML by exporting from Source instance and then importing it back in Target.

2) There is a SN Util feature name as "Add to Update Set" which I find it very handy for these scenario and can capture any data change as well along with updates . Please refer the link below for downloading it:

https://developer.servicenow.com/connect.do#!/share/contents/9824957_add_to_update_set_utility?t=PRODUCT_DETAILS

Let me know if you have a follow up query.

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

Afsar2
Tera Contributor

Hi @shloke04 ,

Thanks for your suggestions.

I have already tried and tested with "Force to update set", it is not working.

We have already discussed this in thread.

Potential cause is due to encryption I believe.

 

Thank you,

Afsar Sheikh

Force to Update set I believe was a different utility, what I am talking about is a new Functionality "Add to Update set" which is free as well and quite handy. See below screenshot where I am able to capture Connection or any other data record you want in the Update set will not be an issue:

find_real_file.png

find_real_file.png

Update Set Screenshot:

find_real_file.png

Please let me know if still you have a query. I would recommend using the "Add to Update Set" utility available in link below:

https://developer.servicenow.com/connect.do#!/share/contents/9824957_add_to_update_set_utility?t=PRODUCT_DETAILS

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

Hope this helps. Please mark the answer as correct/helpful based on impact.

Regards,
Shloke

Afsar2
Tera Contributor

Hi @shloke04 ,

 

I tried "Add to Update set" utility.

I observed that it created batch update sets and converts current update set to parent.

Is this the usual behavior?