CreateNow licenses and core Catalog functionality
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-29-2015 11:26 AM
Assume I have a team with CreateNow licenses and a custom task application.
Are these users capable of receiving sc_tasks from standard Catalog workflows without incurring another stacked licenses?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-29-2015 11:32 AM
For that matter, how much "core" stuff can a CreateNow licensed user use without stepping on a license stack landmine?
- Knowledge?
- Coaching Loops?
- Surveys / Assessments?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-08-2015 11:12 AM
To assign one of the core ticket types to a person for fulfillment (sc_task, incident, change request, change task... etc) requires that user to use the full license (anything the itil role requires). Giving a role to anyone used to consume a license, but now if you create new roles for new tables you create, that only requires a CreateNow license. But if they are fulfilling core things, Knowledge, Incident, etc. that is a license. No license required for approvals or being on the public watch lists of tickets... but if their name can go into an "assigned_to" field and they are able to work and close one of those core ticket types, that's a full license.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-08-2015 11:24 AM
Hey Alan,
I know you're trying to be helpful, but my questions are driving towards greater specificity from ServiceNow, along with alignment with how their platform actually works.
For example,
- you may not be aware but for many contracts, approvals ARE licensed. It just depends on if you're giving the approval / rejection in the full UI or email.
- Being on the watch list? A major Pharma in Illinois was told last year that opening tickets on another's behalf requires a full license.
- Fulfilling core things like Knowledge or Incident? My CreateNow folks don't need incident, but they do need knowledge. Knowledge isn't task, so what makes it require full Service Management license.
- CreateNow apps are tasks and can be assigned, so the simple act of assignment doesn't govern CreateNow license vs "full" license either.
- Request Items are tasks, but they're also core to Service Catalog. Does interacting with them require a Service Management license? (One sales rep has told me yes, another no).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-08-2015 11:30 AM
Yeah it is very confusing, and SN does need better rules and guidelines on it. But anything after Aspen/Berlin no longer requires roles for approvals (inside or outside the system). Probably takes a full license to create new approvals, but it uses a script include that determines isApprovalMine() and allows approvers to approve/reject based on that. Also, opening a ticket on behalf of someone else doesn't cost a license if you have them using Record Producers on the ESS with a custom variable you have created called "On Behalf of" or something and have the Record Producer script pull that into the Caller_ID or Requested_By or another field you designate to do that. But yeah, if you're giving them actual write access to the incident.form or something, I would think that is where the line is drawn for license-use.