- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 06:44 AM
I have the below code in an advanced condition of an email notification. However, I need to join the queries together so that if both are true it sends.
If I have either/or on it's own it works, but I cannot work out how to join them. I have tried the usual && between statements.
//the below works on it's own
if (current.variables.u_disable_opening_notification == "No"){
answer = true;
}
//the below works on it's own
if (sc_request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for){
answer = true;
}
Solved! Go to Solution.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 07:17 AM
I would probably compare to the opened_by field rather than the requested for from the request, but you could do either. You just need to reference the current object, so current.request.requested_for there. Try this:
if (current.variables.u_disable_opening_notification == "No" && current.request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for){
answer = true;
}

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 06:48 AM
Hi Nat,
Is this the whole script? In your second if statement what is sc_request.requested_for referring to? Did you declare sc_request somewhere earlier? If not that condition should be current.sc_request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for
The following should work:
if (current.variables.u_disable_opening_notification == "No" && current.sc_request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for){
answer = true;
}
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 06:58 AM
This is an on Insert notification on the sc_req_item table. This is the whole script.
The intention is...
1 - Checks that in the variables of the item the disable notification option is set to No
2 - Checks against the parent REQ of the current RITM to compare the 'requested_for', so only sends if different.
Scenario 1
- Ticket logged by me on Dan's behalf
sc_request.requested_for would be myself
current.u_requested_for would be Dan
In this example I would expect it to send (Dan would get this, I would get the separate REQ opening notification)
Scenario 2
- Ticket logged by me for me
sc_request.requested_for would be myself
current.u_requested_for would be myself
In this example I would expect it to not send (as I would get the separate REQ opening notification)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 07:17 AM
I would probably compare to the opened_by field rather than the requested for from the request, but you could do either. You just need to reference the current object, so current.request.requested_for there. Try this:
if (current.variables.u_disable_opening_notification == "No" && current.request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for){
answer = true;
}
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-04-2015 07:16 AM
Thanks Brad, it worked using...
if (current.variables.u_disable_opening_notification == "No" && sc_request.requested_for != current.u_requested_for){
answer = true;
}