Fields available for filters
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-18-2015 02:48 AM
Hello,
Is it possible to reduce the number of fields available for including in filters on a list view, without removing read access to the fields themselves? For all task types, there are a lot of fields available to choose from and I'm finding that users get confused by this as they don't have an understanding of what each field does. I want to avoid having to add Read ACLs to the fields I want to hide - partly for the effort involved, and also because I'd like some of the fields to still be visible elsewhere.
So for example, let's say a user with visibility of incidents can see a variety of fields when looking at an incident in form view, but I would like to reduce his options for filtering to those fields I know he'll make us of: eg 'company', 'created', 'closed', 'location', 'short_description', 'priority'.
Regards
Jamie.
- Labels:
-
User Interface (UI)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-23-2015 03:46 AM
Dear Jamie,
Configure ACL for "add_to_list" operation on the required field.
User would not be able to add the columns which they won't have access.
For more info: Section 3 of Using Access Control Rules - ServiceNow Wiki
Thanks,
Subhankar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-24-2015 01:05 AM
Hello Subhankar,
Thank you for your response. This doesn't achieve what I'm after unfortunately. Even with 'add_to_list' ACLs in place, users can still see the fields listed in 'choose field' in filters.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-19-2015 12:47 PM
Hi all,
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-28-2016 02:55 PM
Hi Jamie,
Did you find a solution avoiding the Read ACL? I have a similar requirement.
Thanks,
John