GlideRecord not querying table

EdwinCoronado
ServiceNow Employee
ServiceNow Employee

Hello I have this code that is querying a table called "hr_case". This is a Mail Script that is called on an email notification. However, it is not working. It is not properly querying. I tried "template.print(current.sys_id)" and it is properly returning the sys id, however, the query is not getting executed properly. I tried adding something like "template.print("RECORD FOUND");" inside the "if" scope to see if the record was being found but it is not. I tried passing a hard-coded sys-id for an incident and changed the queried table to 'incident' and that one DOES work. So it seems that the issue is only with the "hr_case" table. I also tried changing the "next()" and "query()" methods to "_next()" and "_query()" just in case there was a field in the table called next or query. Please let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks.

  var link = '';

  var rec = new GlideRecord('hr_case');

  rec.addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id);

  rec.query();

  if(rec.next()){

  link = gs.getProperty('glide.servlet.uri') + 'nav_to.do?uri=' + rec.getLink();

  }

  var pos = link.indexOf('sys_id');

  var ess_link = link.substring(0,pos) + 'sysparm_view=ess%26' + link.substring(pos);

  template.print('<a href="' + ess_link + '">${number}</a>');

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

sys_id is a property on the current object that holds the sys_id of the record. Did you try current.getLink()?


View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6

sys_id is a property on the current object that holds the sys_id of the record. Did you try current.getLink()?


Ah! yes! it works now. This is what I did:



var link = gs.getProperty('glide.servlet.uri') + 'nav_to.do?uri=' + current.getLink();


var pos = link.indexOf('sys_id');


var ess_link = link.substring(0,pos) + 'sysparm_view=ess%26' + link.substring(pos);


template.print('<a href="' + ess_link + '">${number}</a>');



I'm still confused as to why GlideRecord was not working on this table, regardless of what I wanted to accomplish here in the future I could face issues with querying this table, but that is something aside from this question. Thanks Brad!