Postman vs Thunder Client

pollyfelicia
Mega Contributor
Hi there, I have been recommended about using Thunder Client as an alternative to Postman. What stands out in Thunder client as opposed to Postman, or other platforms? Also, how about platforms like Apidog and Bruno? Are they obsolete?
3 REPLIES 3

Community Alums
Not applicable

Hi @pollyfelicia ,

the features of Thunder Client, which is the main alternative for Postman.

  • Lightweight: Thunder Client is a lightweight add-on that can be installed on your VSCode editor and facilitate execution and testing of APIs right from the editor, eliminating the need to download a separate tool or having to switch between the coding environment and a web-based API testing platform.
  • Collections and environment variables support: Like Postman, Thunder Client API tester also provides a collection feature, allowing similar requests to be organized and grouped, making for better accessibility and sharing with others.
  • Supports syntax highlighting and VSCode themes: With the Thunder Client as an add-on extension in VSCode, it also adopts your preset VSCode themes to give it a more visually appealing look.
  • CI/CD integration support: Thunder Client can also be integrated into CI/CD (Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery) pipelines to allow for automated testing of APIs before their deployment.
  • Remarkable Speed: Thunder Client’s API tester ensures swift processing of extensive or intricate API requests, delivering prompt responses.
  • Git Synchronization: Thunder Client’s Git Integration feature enables users to save and sync API request information with a Git repository.
  • Scriptless API testing: Unlike Postman and other API testers, where users need to repeat boilerplate codes to do basic API tests, Thunder Client provides an intuitive and simple GUI where dropdowns can be used to define requests without the need to write test scripts.

Also, refer to this link : https://spin.atomicobject.com/thunder-client/

 

Community Alums
Not applicable

Hi @pollyfelicia ,

 

Anand Kumar P
Giga Patron
Giga Patron

HI @pollyfelicia ,

Thunder Client serves well for basic API testing requirements but falls short on some of Postman’s advanced features like proxy configuration and variable-based scripting. Thus, for complex API processes, Postman continues to hold its own. However, for simple and direct API testing tasks, Thunder Client shines! Its seamless collaboration within Visual Studio Code renders it incredibly convenient for spontaneous testing.
https://medium.com/@satokenta940/the-ultimate-guide-to-api-testing-postman-vs-thunder-client-b8e3986... 

Mark it as helpful and solution proposed if it serves your purpose.
Thanks,
Anand