- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
Hi all,
Can you please provide a use case to explain when we add incident, problem and request to a Release Scope in the DPR Workspace?
I assume it is doable only if the release is about something already configured, against which it is possible to raise incidents and so on. Is that right?
Many thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
Hi @Tommaso2
A release is a bundle of changes, which can include fixes for incidents or problems received.
We add the incident, problem, or change to a release when you are sending the fix for any of these records. For example, a long-standing problem might get fixed, and now as part of the release, you are deploying that fix to production. You can add the problem to the release — this is mainly for tracking purposes.
If my response proves useful, please indicate its helpfulness by selecting " Accept as Solution" and " Helpful." This action benefits both the community and me.
Regards
Dr. Atul G. - Learn N Grow Together
ServiceNow Techno - Functional Trainer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dratulgrover
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@LearnNGrowTogetherwithAtulG
Topmate: https://topmate.io/atul_grover_lng [ Connect for 1-1 Session]
****************************************************************************************************************
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
🎯
Purpose of “Release Scope” in DPR Workspace
In ServiceNow Release Management, a Release Scope defines what work items are part of (or impacted by) a release.
It’s a traceability and risk control mechanism that helps you understand:
“What existing operational records (incidents, problems, requests, changes) are related to this release?”
🔍
When and Why You Add Incident / Problem / Request to a Release Scope
✅
Use Case 1 – Release triggered by recurring incidents (root cause fix)
Scenario:
Multiple Incidents have been raised due to the same software defect (e.g., repeated crashes in a payment service).
A Problem record identifies the root cause — a bug in a backend component.
A Change or Release is created to deploy the fixed code into production.
Adding to Release Scope:
You link those Incidents and the Problem to the Release via “Release Scope”.
This provides traceability — you can later report:
“These 5 incidents were resolved as part of Release 2025.04 (Hotfix).”
It’s essential for Post-Implementation Review and Problem Closure evidence.
📊 Outcome:
Stakeholders can measure incident reduction post-release.
Compliance teams can audit: “Which defects/incidents were addressed in this release?”
✅
Use Case 2 – Release delivers a service request or new feature
Scenario:
A Service Request (e.g., “Add new workflow to onboarding portal”) requires code/config changes.
Developers implement this in a Change/Release.
Once ready, the Request can be linked to the Release Scope.
Adding to Release Scope:
You add the Request (RITM or REQ) to the Release so that:
Its fulfillment lifecycle is tracked within the release timeline.
The release owner can ensure all related requests are delivered and closed with the deployment.
📊 Outcome:
Business sees which Requests are delivered in each release wave.
PMO can trace which backlog features were implemented per release.
✅
Use Case 3 – Release resolves a Problem
Scenario:
A Problem Record is raised (e.g., “Slow performance in mobile app checkout”).
Root cause: suboptimal query in code.
Development fixes it, packaged as part of a Release.
Adding to Release Scope:
The Problem is linked to the Release to indicate this release resolves that problem.
📊 Outcome:
You can automatically close the Problem record once the Release is marked “Deployed”.
Provides direct linkage for RCA and audit: Which release contained the fix?
✅
Use Case 4 – Post-Release validation of operational impact
Scenario:
After deployment, users report Incidents that might have been caused by or related to the new release (regression, side effects, etc.).
Release Manager adds these new Incidents to the Release Scope post-deployment.
📊 Outcome:
Enables impact analysis and post-release quality metrics:
Number of incidents created within 7 days of release (regression indicator).
MTBF between releases.
🧩
How ServiceNow Enables It (Mechanically)
In DPR (Release Workspace):
“Scope” tab → “Add Related Records” → select Incident, Problem, or Request.
These relationships are stored in m2m tables (rm_release_scope, etc.).
You can view and report on:
“Which Incidents/Problems are in this Release?”
“Which Release resolved this Incident/Problem?”
🧠
Your assumption — partially correct
“It is doable only if the release is about something already configured, against which it is possible to raise incidents.”
✅ Yes — practically, this makes sense.
Usually, you link existing operational records (incidents, problems, requests) that are about a deployed or configured service/component.
You wouldn’t link random incidents — only those relevant to the scope of work in that release.
However:
You can technically add any record, but it only makes business sense when the release changes or affects the same configuration item(s) (CI) that those operational records reference.
It’s about maintaining logical traceability, not just data linkage.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
Hi @Tommaso2
A release is a bundle of changes, which can include fixes for incidents or problems received.
We add the incident, problem, or change to a release when you are sending the fix for any of these records. For example, a long-standing problem might get fixed, and now as part of the release, you are deploying that fix to production. You can add the problem to the release — this is mainly for tracking purposes.
If my response proves useful, please indicate its helpfulness by selecting " Accept as Solution" and " Helpful." This action benefits both the community and me.
Regards
Dr. Atul G. - Learn N Grow Together
ServiceNow Techno - Functional Trainer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dratulgrover
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@LearnNGrowTogetherwithAtulG
Topmate: https://topmate.io/atul_grover_lng [ Connect for 1-1 Session]
****************************************************************************************************************
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
🎯
Purpose of “Release Scope” in DPR Workspace
In ServiceNow Release Management, a Release Scope defines what work items are part of (or impacted by) a release.
It’s a traceability and risk control mechanism that helps you understand:
“What existing operational records (incidents, problems, requests, changes) are related to this release?”
🔍
When and Why You Add Incident / Problem / Request to a Release Scope
✅
Use Case 1 – Release triggered by recurring incidents (root cause fix)
Scenario:
Multiple Incidents have been raised due to the same software defect (e.g., repeated crashes in a payment service).
A Problem record identifies the root cause — a bug in a backend component.
A Change or Release is created to deploy the fixed code into production.
Adding to Release Scope:
You link those Incidents and the Problem to the Release via “Release Scope”.
This provides traceability — you can later report:
“These 5 incidents were resolved as part of Release 2025.04 (Hotfix).”
It’s essential for Post-Implementation Review and Problem Closure evidence.
📊 Outcome:
Stakeholders can measure incident reduction post-release.
Compliance teams can audit: “Which defects/incidents were addressed in this release?”
✅
Use Case 2 – Release delivers a service request or new feature
Scenario:
A Service Request (e.g., “Add new workflow to onboarding portal”) requires code/config changes.
Developers implement this in a Change/Release.
Once ready, the Request can be linked to the Release Scope.
Adding to Release Scope:
You add the Request (RITM or REQ) to the Release so that:
Its fulfillment lifecycle is tracked within the release timeline.
The release owner can ensure all related requests are delivered and closed with the deployment.
📊 Outcome:
Business sees which Requests are delivered in each release wave.
PMO can trace which backlog features were implemented per release.
✅
Use Case 3 – Release resolves a Problem
Scenario:
A Problem Record is raised (e.g., “Slow performance in mobile app checkout”).
Root cause: suboptimal query in code.
Development fixes it, packaged as part of a Release.
Adding to Release Scope:
The Problem is linked to the Release to indicate this release resolves that problem.
📊 Outcome:
You can automatically close the Problem record once the Release is marked “Deployed”.
Provides direct linkage for RCA and audit: Which release contained the fix?
✅
Use Case 4 – Post-Release validation of operational impact
Scenario:
After deployment, users report Incidents that might have been caused by or related to the new release (regression, side effects, etc.).
Release Manager adds these new Incidents to the Release Scope post-deployment.
📊 Outcome:
Enables impact analysis and post-release quality metrics:
Number of incidents created within 7 days of release (regression indicator).
MTBF between releases.
🧩
How ServiceNow Enables It (Mechanically)
In DPR (Release Workspace):
“Scope” tab → “Add Related Records” → select Incident, Problem, or Request.
These relationships are stored in m2m tables (rm_release_scope, etc.).
You can view and report on:
“Which Incidents/Problems are in this Release?”
“Which Release resolved this Incident/Problem?”
🧠
Your assumption — partially correct
“It is doable only if the release is about something already configured, against which it is possible to raise incidents.”
✅ Yes — practically, this makes sense.
Usually, you link existing operational records (incidents, problems, requests) that are about a deployed or configured service/component.
You wouldn’t link random incidents — only those relevant to the scope of work in that release.
However:
You can technically add any record, but it only makes business sense when the release changes or affects the same configuration item(s) (CI) that those operational records reference.
It’s about maintaining logical traceability, not just data linkage.
