Which is the property in Event Management which defines time to create new alert from events
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2025 03:30 AM
Hello all,
Can anyone please let me know below queries:
1. What is the system property that defines the time for creating a new alert?
2. Also what's the default value set for that property in instance?
Any quick is much appreciated
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Pranita Bahuguni
- Labels:
-
Event Management
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2025 04:11 AM
Hi @Pranita Bahugun ,
- When new additional events are generated which on processing finds existing closed alert then the alert is reopened. An alert can be reopened manually.
- Reopening of existing closed alert by new events is controlled by property "evt_mgmt.active_interval".
- By default value of this property is 14400 sec. This means that if an alert is closed and a new event is generated within 4 hours which matches the same message key then the existing alert is reopened.
- When an alert is reopened, the related incident is processed as follows:
- If the incident is not Resolved or Closed, a work note is added to indicate that the related alert was reopened.
- If the incident is Resolved or Closed, the incident is reopened, a new incident is created, or nothing is done, depending on the evt_mgmt.alert_reopens_incident property value.
- If the incident is reopened, work notes are added to the incident.
- If a new incident is created, any matching alert management rule, alert action rule, and task template apply to the incident.
- If there is no matching alert rule or template, fields from the existing incident are copied to a new incident.
- The business rule that gets executed post alert reopen is "Reopen associated closed incident"
- This BR calls for script include "EvtMgmtAlertManagementAlertReopenHandler" which again invoke the Alert Management process to find the correct rule and perform the remediation action.
To Learn more in terms of Alerts processing in diffrent states and the whole flow : https://support.servicenow.com/kb?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0756521
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2025 04:32 AM
@Community Alums , Thankyou for your response, can you also let me know what should be the best practice to set these properties? That would be of great help. Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-27-2025 05:22 AM
Hi @Pranita Bahugun ,
Here you Goooo 😊
Use these properties to configure alert insight.
The following alert_insight properties are under sys_properties.
Property | Usage |
---|---|
Time Frame | |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_alert_history_min | Set the time frame (in minutes) to retrieve repeated and similar alert data. Default 43200 (30 days)
Note: Alerts are retrieved regardless of their state (open / reopen / flapping / closed).
|
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_closed_alert_window | Set the time frame (in minutes) to retrieve alerts that were already closed. It is the time after the alert last updated date. Default: 4320 (3 days) |
Similarity | |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_alert_same_as_filter | This property is a comma-separated string that defines which of the alert fields is used to consider alerts to be similar. Default: source,type,resource,metric_name |
Related CIs | |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_related_cis_topology_levels
The relationship types are:
|
For ‘Within application service’ relationship type, this property sets the depth or the maximum level of relationship of retrieved CIs. Default: 3 |
Score | |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_group_mapping | This property sets the score for within alert group relations. Default: 2 |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_level_1_mapping | This property sets the score for level 1 relationship. Default: 3 |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_level_2_mapping | This property sets the score for level 2 relationship. Default: 2 |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_level_3_mapping | This property sets the score for level 3 relationship. Default: 1 |
Maximum related tasks | |
evt_mgmt.alert_insight_max_tasks | Maximum related tasks to retrieve for alert insight. Default: 10 |
Metadata rules consideration
The parent-child relationship of CIs is considered. Dependent relationship rules consist of hosting and containment rules, each type modeling the data from a different perspective of the CI.
To manage dependent relationship rules:- To access rules at the class level, use the CI Class Manager. Navigate to All > Configuration > CI Class Manager.
- To access grouped rules, use the Metadata Editor. Navigate to All > Configuration > Identification/Reconciliation > Metadata Editor.
Containment rules represent configuration hierarchy of CIs, describing which CI contains which other CIs.
Hosting rules represent placement of CIs in a business definition, describing what CIs run on.
Modify the alert insight properties to configure the way alert information and analysis appears in the Alert Insight pane.
Related CIs configuration
The following properties control which CMDB relationships to consider for related CIs. The CMDB relationships include regular CMDB relation rules, metadata rules (containment rules and hosting rules), and suggested relations.
Property | Usage |
---|---|
evt_mgmt.related_cis_get_all_relation_types | Get all relation types, not including metadata rules. Default: false |
evt_mgmt.related_cis_use_containment_rules | Use metadata containment rules. Default: true |
evt_mgmt.related_cis_use_hosting_rules | Use metadata hosting rules. Default: true |
evt_mgmt.related_cis_use_suggested_relations_rules | Use suggested relations rules. Default: false |
evt_mgmt.related_cis_validate_relation_rules | This property controls whether to validate relation of CI according to metadata rules. Default: true |
Score
Scores are configured per relation type or depth. Scores are accumulated. The higher the score, the more relevant is the related CI to the current CI.
Example:For a CI that was found at level 2 in the same application service of the current CI, the score is 2. The same CI is in the same alert group, so there is an extra score of 3. The accumulated score is therefore 2+3 = 5.