- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-14-2024 09:45 AM
When you create a RITM from a catalog item, an "Item" field is populated which tells you which catalog item that the RITM was generated from. I am trying to determine if there is an equivalent field for record producers. We have a scoped app in which multiple record producers will be creating records on a scoped table and we want to be able to report on the different kinds of record producers for records generated on that table.
I haven't been able to find a like field for "Item" so if anyone is aware of one or an equivalent solution to support such a functionality it would be appreciated!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-14-2024 10:08 AM
Hi @Maurice Murphy,
Based on the fact you're implementing a scoped app, I would just mirror similar to the HR Core service app (SN Scoped App) and create a field of type reference that points to the Record Producer table (sc_cat_item_producer).
You can then set this new (custom) field on creation of the record based on the Record Producer it's generated from.
There is no generic field available for you, especially as you're using from a scoped perspective.
To help others (or for me to help you more directly), please mark this response correct by clicking on Accept as Solution and/or Kudos.
Thanks, Robbie
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-14-2024 10:08 AM
Hi @Maurice Murphy,
Based on the fact you're implementing a scoped app, I would just mirror similar to the HR Core service app (SN Scoped App) and create a field of type reference that points to the Record Producer table (sc_cat_item_producer).
You can then set this new (custom) field on creation of the record based on the Record Producer it's generated from.
There is no generic field available for you, especially as you're using from a scoped perspective.
To help others (or for me to help you more directly), please mark this response correct by clicking on Accept as Solution and/or Kudos.
Thanks, Robbie