- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 09:57 PM
We are observing this issue ,currently we are in Madrid patch 9 version..
Could you please suggest.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Request Management
-
Service Catalog

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 11:37 PM
Hi Rajasekahr,
The field you are viewing on the form is a sc_req_item table field and field on the list view is a field of sc_task table field. So, basically you are viewing two different fields and that's the reason you are unable to see any values in list layout.
"sc_req_item" table field is "configuration_item"
"sc_task" table field is "cmdb_ci".
Kindly mark my answer as Correct and Helpful based on the Impact.
Regards,
Chaitanya
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 10:14 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 10:14 PM
please refer the screenshot
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 10:39 PM
Hi,
the field is coming from RITM table on the Task list layout; check value is present on the CI field on the RITM; also check the list layout is showing the correct dot walked field
Mark ✅ Correct if this solves your issue and also mark 👍 Helpful if you find my response worthy based on the impact.
Thanks
Ankur
Ankur
✨ Certified Technical Architect || ✨ 9x ServiceNow MVP || ✨ ServiceNow Community Leader
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2020 11:22 PM
Hi Ankur,
I will try and let you know the result in development box.
Thank you
Musani.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-30-2020 09:58 PM
Thanks Ankur for your inputs ..it worked fine.