Once Weekly Indicator/Indicator Setup?

[mlanderson]

I've been using the out of box PA content packs for Change, and I'm trying to figure out the best approach to the following scenario:

GOAL:

An indicator that shows the number of open changes with a Planned Start Date on Sunday for each week. I want to be able to view the indicator each day (Mon - Fri) and see all the open Changes that have a Planned Start Date on Sunday (that weekend). Each day should show the total # of changes for the week that fit the criteria.

PROBLEM:

I've tried creating an indicator with the following settings:

Indicator Source:   Changes.Open (default settings from the Change PA content pack)
Frequency: Daily
Aggregate: Count

Additional Conditions: PLANNED START DATE trend on SUNDAY and PLANNED START DATE on NEXT WEEK (i.e. I want all the open changes with a Planned Start Date on that weekend's Sunday)

Default Time Series:   Week to Date SUM

Jobs: Daily & Historic

Unfortunately, this indicator does not seem to be returning all of the open changes that fit the criteria. I can go to the change table and apply the additional filter conditions noted above and see multiple open changes that aren't showing in the indicator. I'm not sure why. Should I be using a different indicator source? I've also noticed the indicator score is often different from the number of records shown on the record tab for a particular day. For example, the indicator might show a score of 9 for a given day, but only show 2 records on the record tab. Not sure what's happening there.

I've never setup a weekly indicator before, so I'm not sure if I'm proceeding correctly. Any help appreciated!

[Laxmikanth]

Hi,

Hope you already have a Historic & Daily data collection job for change records. If not please create them first and the add this indicator in their related list.   Please refer to the below link

Performance Analytics data collection and cleanup

[mlanderson]

Hi Laxmikanth,

I do have both a daily and historic job associated with indicator.   Unfortunately, I don't think that's the issue.