- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-02-2025 09:37 AM
Hello,
I am attempting to modify a module to load a table sorted by item number in ascending order to enhance performance. Despite setting the link type to URL and configuring the arguments, the module continues to use user preferences to load the vulnerable items table, rather than the arguments that I set. Could someone assist me with this configuration?
Thank you!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Vulnerability Response
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-02-2025 10:01 AM
Hi @gatesjj2 ,
try this
put this in the arugments
sn_vul_vulnerable_item_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true^ORDERBYnumber
Please mark my answer as helpful/correct if it resolves your query.
Regards,
Chaitanya
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-02-2025 10:01 AM
Hi @gatesjj2 ,
try this
put this in the arugments
sn_vul_vulnerable_item_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true^ORDERBYnumber
Please mark my answer as helpful/correct if it resolves your query.
Regards,
Chaitanya
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-02-2025 10:02 AM - edited ‎05-02-2025 10:04 AM
Hi @gatesjj2 ,
I check the similar link and found when we applying ORDERBY with other filter condition, there is no "^" sign for AND condition ( & for AND for filter ) , You can try to create the URL in list view and copy that link in "Link Type" and test.
OR you can add below sys param for order direction.
&sysparm_order=number&sysparm_order_direction=asc
Example : on Incident table
https://devAAA.service-now.com/incident_list.do?sysparm_query=active%3Dtrue&sysparm_order=number&sysparm_order_direction=asc
-Thanks,
Ashish Mishra
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13193330/
Please mark this response as correct and helpful if it helps you can mark more that one reply as accepted solution