Join the #BuildWithBuildAgent Challenge! Get recognized, earn exclusive swag, and inspire the ServiceNow Community with what you can build using Build Agent.  Join the Challenge.

Multi-Relationship Configuration Between Lead, Opportunity, and Quote Management

anaveen81
Tera Contributor

ServiceNow's out-of-the-box (OOB) functionality supports a one-to-one relationship between Lead and Opportunity, and between Opportunity and Quote. However, our business requirement involves creating multiple Opportunities from a single Lead, and multiple Quotes from a single Opportunity. To support this, we are considering configuring a system many-to-many (M2M) table to enable these multi-relationship mappings.

It appears to be there is potential impact of deviating from the standard OOB process—specifically, this change might affect the flow from Lead Lines to Opportunity Lines, and from Opportunity Lines to Quote Lines. Does anyone have this kind of requirement and any idea ServiceNow has any roadmap or future plans to support such multi-relationship scenarios natively?"

4 REPLIES 4

BrandiC2
Tera Contributor

I haven't run across customers with this requirement yet but that isn't to say it won't happen sometime. I haven't heard that ServiceNow has it on their roadmap\future plans. You can request the enhancement in the ServiceNow Idea Portal.  You can follow the request during the process. 

 

Implementing a multi-relationship (many-to-many) configuration between Leads, Opportunities, and Quotes in ServiceNow Sales Order Management can offer flexibility for your organization. However, it introduces complexity in system design, data flow, reporting, and upgrade maintenance that you need to prepare for when implementing that solution. 

 

The trade-off lies between maintaining a platform that leverages ServiceNow’s out-of-the-box configured simplicity and fulfilling business needs requiring customizations that could break with future ServiceNow releases. The new customizations could be worth pursuing when the business model cannot be accurately represented using the standard one-to-one relationships.  Below are the high level Configuration Steps. 

 

   1.  Create Many-to-Many (M2M) Tables

  • Lead ↔ Opportunity M2M Table
    • Custom table with references to both Lead and Opportunity records.
    • Include metadata fields (e.g., relationship type, creation date).
  • Opportunity ↔ Quote M2M Table
    • Similar structure with references to Opportunity and Quote.

  2.  Update Forms and UI Policies

  • Modify Lead and Opportunity forms to show related records via M2M tables.
  • Use related lists or embedded lists for visibility.

 3.  Adjust Business Rules and Workflows

  • Ensure automation (e.g., status changes, notifications) accounts for multiple related records.
  • Reconfigure approval flows to handle multiple Quotes per Opportunity.

 4.  Customize Data Flow Logic

  • Rebuild logic for:
  • Lead Lines → Opportunity Lines
  • Opportunity Lines → Quote Lines
  • Ensure data integrity and traceability across relationships.

 5.  Reporting and Analytics

  • Create custom reports and dashboards using joins across M2M tables.
  • Avoid double-counting by filtering based on relationship context

If you decide to pursue it , outside of the platform changes a few other suggestions would include increased governance, clear architecture, update your testing strategy to cover the customizations and technical debt  documentation. Good Luck.

Thank you BrandiC2. I was looking at this customization but as you are rightly said, it will introduce the complexity. Hence I was checking if anyone has done this differently.

Me Being Mustaq
Tera Guru

Hi @anaveen81 ,

 

ServiceNow currently supports only one-to-one relationships between Lead → Opportunity and Opportunity → Quote out-of-the-box. If you need multiple Opportunities per Lead or multiple Quotes per Opportunity, you must configure a custom many-to-many (M2M) table. As of now, ServiceNow has no published roadmap for native support of multi-relationship scenarios in CRM/Sales modules.

 

1. OOB Limitation
• Standard ServiceNow Sales & Order Management (SOM) enforces:
• Lead → Opportunity = one-to-one
• Opportunity → Quote = one-to-one
• This design simplifies the flow of Lead Lines → Opportunity Lines → Quote Lines, but restricts flexibility for businesses needing multiple mappings

 

2. Custom M2M Approach

  • You can configure a system many-to-many table to allow:
    • One Lead linked to multiple Opportunities.
    • One Opportunity linked to multiple Quotes.
  • ServiceNow provides documentation on creating M2M relationships between tables.
  • Impact:
  • Lead Lines → Opportunity Lines mapping may break, since OOB assumes a single downstream record.
  • Similarly, Opportunity Lines → Quote Lines may not cascade correctly without custom logic.
  • You’ll likely need custom Flow Designer logic or Business Rules to handle line propagation across multiple children.

3. Audit & Reporting Considerations

  • If you implement M2M:
  • Maintain an audit table to track mappings (Lead ↔ Opportunity, Opportunity ↔ Quote).
  • Ensure reporting dashboards are updated to reflect multiple downstream records.
  • Consider UI Policies to guide users when selecting multiple related records.

 

4. Roadmap / Future Plans

  • Based on ServiceNow community discussions and documentation, multi-relationship support is not currently on the OOB roadmap.
  • ServiceNow’s CRM capabilities are still evolving, but the focus has been on simplifying pipeline flows rather than supporting complex multi-mappings.
  • If this is a critical need, it’s worth raising an Idea in the ServiceNow Community/Now Ideas portal to influence product direction.

 

 Recommendations

  • Proceed with a custom M2M table if your business requires multi-relationships.
  • Build custom flows to handle line propagation (Lead Lines → Opportunity Lines → Quote Lines).
  • Document the deviation from OOB clearly, since upgrades may require regression testing.
  • Engage with ServiceNow’s Customer Success or Product Management to highlight this requirement for future releases.

If it is helpful, please hit the thumbs button please mark the answer as correct based on the impact!!

 

Kind Regards,

Shaik Mohammed Mustaq