- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-25-2025 06:02 AM
Hi All,
We have a use case of auto assignment of records to certain group of people. Assignment group is auto-populated through assignment rule. Now we are looking to auto populate the "assigned to" field using AWA.
I have created two service channels, both differ slightly in the conditions based on value selected in "Type" field on the record.
First channel conditions : active = true AND Type = 'a'
Second channel conditions: active = true AND Type = 'b'
These should be assigned to same group, but few group members will be working on both type of request and few will be working dedicatedly on "Type = 'a'" requests and others will work on 'Type = 'b''
How to achieve this using AWA?
My auto-allocation is working for First channel conditions, but second channel conditions are not at all working.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2025 04:00 AM
Thank you all for your responses.
I found the issue the presence states were not mapped with my second service channel. Hence it was not auto assigning.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-25-2025 06:37 AM
Hello @User263012
Please share screenshot of your service channel and AWA configurations once..
Kindly mark my answer as helpful and accept solution if it helped you in anyway. This will help me be recognized for the efforts and also move this questions from unsolved to solved bucket.
Regards,
Shivalika
My LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivalika-gupta-540346194
My youtube - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsHuNzTdkE5Cn4PyS7HdV0Vg8JsfdgQlA&si=0WynLcOwNeEISQCY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-25-2025 06:40 AM
Hello @User263012
I think the issue should be in eligibilty rules. So must share Assignment eligibility related list in your Assignment rule within AWA.
Kindly mark my answer as helpful and accept solution if it helped you in anyway. This will help me be recognized for the efforts and also move this questions from unsolved to solved bucket.
Regards,
Shivalika
My LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivalika-gupta-540346194
My youtube - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsHuNzTdkE5Cn4PyS7HdV0Vg8JsfdgQlA&si=0WynLcOwNeEISQCY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-25-2025 06:47 AM
Hi @User263012,
Just a quick FYI - Core predefined assignment rules will take precedence over newly implemented AWA assignment rules so to be sure there is no conflict there.
Re how to set this up, type 'Advanced Work Assignments' into the Navigation menu and select 'Assignment Groups'. From here you can create new rules to assign as you wish based on channel etc.
Additionally, check this ServiceNow docs link with some steps and guide: https://www.servicenow.com/docs/bundle/yokohama-platform-user-interface/page/administer/workspace/co...
To help others (and for me to gain recognition for my efforts), please mark this response correct by clicking on Accept as Solution and/or Kudos.
Thanks, Robbie
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2025 04:00 AM
Thank you all for your responses.
I found the issue the presence states were not mapped with my second service channel. Hence it was not auto assigning.