- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-03-2024 04:26 AM
Hi we ran some deduplication remediation but for some it resulted that both involved ci where deleted instead of merged.
does any one have an Idea on what might cause this?
that way we can try to prevent it to happen in the future
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-04-2024 12:55 AM
I ran in to this https://support.servicenow.com/kb?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0753605 artikle on the topic.
luckily we our non prod instance had still the data in so i validated the case here was that
ci A pointed to an asset and that asset pointed to CI B
so here when ci A was merged to ci B it cascade delete the Asset and the deletion of the asset cascade deleted CI B
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-03-2024 04:36 AM - edited 10-03-2024 04:37 AM
If both CIs were deleted instead of merged during deduplication, potential causes include:
Possible Causes
- Incorrect Matching Logic: Broad or poorly defined criteria could lead to false positives.
- Misconfigured Merge Rules: Rules may default to deletion under certain conditions.
- Data Integrity Issues: Conflicting or incomplete data might hinder proper merging.
- User Error: Manual actions during the process could result in accidental deletions.
- Workflow Errors: Bugs in automation scripts could lead to unintended outcomes.
- Lack of Backup: Without backups, deleted CIs cannot be restored.
if you found this helpful please accept as solution and mark helpful
best
Chetna
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-04-2024 12:55 AM
I ran in to this https://support.servicenow.com/kb?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0753605 artikle on the topic.
luckily we our non prod instance had still the data in so i validated the case here was that
ci A pointed to an asset and that asset pointed to CI B
so here when ci A was merged to ci B it cascade delete the Asset and the deletion of the asset cascade deleted CI B