Identification Rule Question - SCCM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 hours ago
Is there a way for computers being created via SCCM specifically, to have their own custom id rules that are specific to SCCM?
We have a requirement from a customer to use only serial and or another attribute SMBIOS_GUID to use, and to use those attributes only to identify a computer.
Is there a way to create another ID rule for SCCM to use (and maybe qualify to that Discoverysource), or another workaround to achieve this? We have a small amount of other data going into the computer table (from other sources), and it might be best not to customize to out of box hardware rule.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 hours ago
Hi @anfield,
Yes — this is possible using IRE Identification Rules + Data Source Rules for SCCM specifically.
using only:
- Serial Number
- SMBIOS_GUID
and qualify it for SCCM source.
Do NOT heavily customize the OOTB Hardware Rule directly.
Instead:
- Create a new Identification Rule
- Set higher priority than OOTB rule
- Add condition:
Discovery source = SCCM- Use identifiers:
- serial_number
- smbios_guid
Ensure:
- SCCM always populates SMBIOS_GUID consistently
- serial numbers are normalized
- IRE precedence order is validated
source-aware identification through identification rules and reconciliation definitions- using stable unique identifiers
- minimizing OOTB customization
- using source-specific reconciliation behavior where possible
This is the safest long-term approach for SCCM-specific identification behavior.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
an hour ago - last edited an hour ago
Thanks for the response.
Giving this a try and getting a message on the identifier table - "There is already an identifier created for this CI class, use and edit rules associated with it!"
The oob computer rule is inactive (and has independent) checked. Id rather create a new custom one and leave this one alone