Correct relations in CSDM. TMSO to TMS when using Service Builder

Henrik Jutterst
Kilo Sage

I've heard that when using Service Builder, the correct relations betwen Technology Management Service and Technology Management Service Offering should be created.

 

I have created TMS and TMSO in my PDI using Service Builder, but looking at the CIs I see no relations.

HenrikJutterst_0-1759172758628.png

HenrikJutterst_0-1759172829765.png

 

 

 

I want to verify that the correct relations are being used when using Service Builder.

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Johannes
Kilo Sage

Hi @Henrik Jutterst 
I do not believe there should be created any relationships between the TMSs and TMOs (and nether between BSs and BSOs), only references.

View solution in original post

Mathew Hillyard
Mega Sage

Hi @Henrik Jutterst 

Service is a parent for Service Offering. This relationship does not use CI Relationships, it is a "reference" relationship.

  • On the Business/Technology Management Service table you need to add the Service Offerings related list to see the Offerings.
  • On the Service Offering table look at the Parent field to see the Service (it is mandatory OOTB). I can see the Service in the Parent field in your second screenshot.

 

I hope this helps!

Mat

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3

Johannes
Kilo Sage

Hi @Henrik Jutterst 
I do not believe there should be created any relationships between the TMSs and TMOs (and nether between BSs and BSOs), only references.

Mathew Hillyard
Mega Sage

Hi @Henrik Jutterst 

Service is a parent for Service Offering. This relationship does not use CI Relationships, it is a "reference" relationship.

  • On the Business/Technology Management Service table you need to add the Service Offerings related list to see the Offerings.
  • On the Service Offering table look at the Parent field to see the Service (it is mandatory OOTB). I can see the Service in the Parent field in your second screenshot.

 

I hope this helps!

Mat

Henrik Jutterst
Kilo Sage

Thank you, you are all correct. I see in the documentation that it should be a ref instead.

 

Kind regards

 

HenrikJutterst_0-1760522156263.png