Need help modifying ACL script to use system property for editable variables on sc_task

[Pratiksha KC]

Hi 

We currently have an ACL where item names are hardcoded to make variables editable on the sc_task level. However, we now want to replace this hardcoding and use a system property (with either a comma-separated list or query) to determine which catalog items should have editable variables.

I tried the below script, but it’s not working as expected. Could anyone please help me modify or correct it?

Script-

(function() {
// Read comma-separated sys_ids of catalog items from property
var editableItems = gs.getProperty('glide.sc_task.editable_variables', '').split(',');

// Clean and normalize
editableItems = editableItems.map(function(x) { return x.trim(); }).filter(Boolean);

// Get current catalog item's sys_id from the sc_task record
var itemSysId = current.item ? current.item.toString() : '';

// Allow edit only if current item's sys_id is listed in the property
return editableItems.indexOf(itemSysId) !== -1;
})();

System property-

[Ankur Bawiskar · Accepted solution]

@Pratiksha KC 

so none of the variables should be editable on catalog task form to any user for RITMs belonging to those Items?

If yes then 2 approaches

1) onLoad client script + display business rule on sc_task

Display BR

(function executeRule(current, previous /*null when async*/ ) {

    // Add your code here
    var editableItems = gs.getProperty('glide.sc_task.editable_variables');

    if (editableItems) {
        var arr = editableItems.split(',');
        var currentItem = current.request_item.cat_item.sys_id;
        g_scratchpad.makeReadonly = !(arr.indexOf(currentItem) > -1); // I added not in the beginning
    } else {
        g_scratchpad.makeReadonly = false;
    }

})(current, previous);

Normal onLoad Client Script and not catalog client script:

function onLoad() {
    if (g_scratchpad.makeReadonly)
        g_form.setVariablesReadOnly(true);
}

OR

2) ACL -> I am not sure if this works fine, you are already using this.

If the 2nd approach doesn't work or it takes time, 1st approach will work for sure.

💡 If my response helped, please mark it as correct ✅ and close the thread 🔒— this helps future readers find the solution faster! 🙏