Vendor Management Workspace 21.1.5 – record-vertical not honoring Engagement related lists (Zurich)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
3 hours ago
After upgrading to Vendor Management Workspace v21.1.5 on Zurich Patch 6, we noticed a change in how related lists are rendered for Engagement (sn_vdr_risk_asmt_vendor_engagement) records.
- With the new
record-verticalvariant in UI Builder, our custom Engagement related lists defined insys_ui_related_listno longer appear in Vendor Management Workspace. - If we inactivate
record-verticaland instead userecord-default, the Engagement form renders all related lists fromsys_ui_related_listcorrectly (horizontal layout).
So functionally, record-default works and surfaces our related list changes, but we’re concerned about alignment with the newer OOB experience.
Questions:
Is there a supported way / best practice in UI Builder to replace or override the OOB record‑details configuration used by
record-verticalso that we can add, remove, and reorder related lists for the Engagement record page (rather than relying only on the app-lockedrecordDetailsCtrlbehavior)?If related lists are only meant to be driven by
sys_ui_related_liston the Engagement form, is it supported and safe long term to leave Engagements onrecord-defaultinstead ofrecord-vertical?- Any risks to this approach (e.g., missing future TPRM UX features, upgrade conflicts, or unsupported configuration) that we should be aware of?
Environment:
- Product: Third-party Risk Management / Vendor Management Workspace v 21.1.5
- Platform: Zurich Patch 6
- Table:
sn_vdr_risk_asmt_vendor_engagement
Looking for confirmation on the intended pattern and any best practices for managing Engagement related lists in this release.
- Labels:
-
Vendor Risk Management
