Get a first look at what's coming. The Developer Passport Australia Release Preview kicks off March 12. Dive in! 

Vendor Management Workspace 21.1.5 – record-vertical not honoring Engagement related lists (Zurich)

Lori-GM
Tera Contributor

After upgrading to Vendor Management Workspace v21.1.5 on Zurich Patch 6, we noticed a change in how related lists are rendered for Engagement (sn_vdr_risk_asmt_vendor_engagement) records.

 

  • With the new record-vertical variant in UI Builder, our custom Engagement related lists defined in sys_ui_related_list no longer appear in Vendor Management Workspace.
  • If we inactivate record-vertical and instead use record-default, the Engagement form renders all related lists from sys_ui_related_list correctly (horizontal layout).

So functionally, record-default works and surfaces our related list changes, but we’re concerned about alignment with the newer OOB experience.

 

Questions:

  1. Is there a supported way / best practice in UI Builder to replace or override the OOB record‑details configuration used by record-vertical so that we can add, remove, and reorder related lists for the Engagement record page (rather than relying only on the app-locked recordDetailsCtrl behavior)?

  2. If related lists are only meant to be driven by sys_ui_related_list on the Engagement form, is it supported and safe long term to leave Engagements on record-default instead of record-vertical?

    • Any risks to this approach (e.g., missing future TPRM UX features, upgrade conflicts, or unsupported configuration) that we should be aware of?

Environment:

  • Product: Third-party Risk Management / Vendor Management Workspace v 21.1.5
  • Platform: Zurich Patch 6
  • Table: sn_vdr_risk_asmt_vendor_engagement

Looking for confirmation on the intended pattern and any best practices for managing Engagement related lists in this release.

0 REPLIES 0