- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-02-2020 07:52 AM
In our HR service catalog on our HR portal we have many service catalog items that leverage record producers to turn employees' requests into HR cases. Out-of-the-box (OOB), the HR record producer scripts call functions in the sn_hr_core.hr_ServicesUtil script include to pass the information entered by the employee into the case.
We now have a requirement that demands changes to these functions. We don't want to customize the OOB functions, and are instead looking at creating a wrapper around this script include to override the functions. So far however, we've been unable to get this to work.
What we've done is create a custom script include within the same sn_hr_core scope that overrides the functions as follows:
var SIG_hr_ServicesUtil = Class.create();
SIG_hr_ServicesUtil.prototype = Object.extendsObject(sn_hr_core.hr_ServicesUtil, {
initialize : function(_case, _gs) {
sn_hr_core.hr_ServicesUtil.initialize.call(_case, _gs);
},
createCaseFromProducer : function(producer, rpId) {
... (our custom code here)
},
type: 'SIG_hr_ServicesUtil'
});
In our record producer script we call the custom function as follows:
new sn_hr_core.SIG_hr_ServicesUtil(current, gs).createCaseFromProducer(producer, cat_item.sys_id);
However, when doing so and submitting a service catalog item from our portal, we get an error and the overriding is not working:
org.mozilla.javascript.EcmaError: undefined is not a function.
Caused by error in <refname> at line 1
==> 1: new sn_hr_core.SIG_hr_ServicesUtil(current, gs).createCaseFromProducer(producer, cat_item.sys_id);
What are we overlooking here? Is it even possible to override the OOB functions without customizing the script include?
Best regards,
Pascal Frencken
IT Architect, Signify, The Netherlands
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-03-2020 06:47 AM
Hi,
You should create that script include in HR Core Scope and Accessible from All scopes.
the OOB Script Include is in HR Core Scope -> hr_ServicesUtil
Are you trying to include this in record producer present in global scope
If you are trying to add restricted caller access then source scope should be global scope
Regards
Ankur
Ankur
✨ Certified Technical Architect || ✨ 9x ServiceNow MVP || ✨ ServiceNow Community Leader
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-02-2020 08:10 AM
Hi,
seems error because of the gs variable/object you are using
what functionality you are to trying to achieve?
Regards
Ankur
Ankur
✨ Certified Technical Architect || ✨ 9x ServiceNow MVP || ✨ ServiceNow Community Leader
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-02-2020 09:23 AM
Hi Ankur,
The gs object is the GlideSystem, which is available. Why would that cause an issue?
The functionality we're trying to achieve is to override the OOB createCaseFromProducer() function to only put variables in the case that were actually shown on screen in the service catalog item. Right now with the OOB functionality also values of hidden variables are passed into the case, which is not what we want.
Best regards,
Pascal Frencken
IT Architect, Signify, The Netherlands

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-02-2020 11:01 AM
Hi Pascal,
You may find below link helpful https://community.servicenow.com/community?id=community_question&sys_id=364047a1db98dbc01dcaf3231f96...
If you this setup in PDI instance, please share ONLY link with me and I can take a look.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-02-2020 11:09 PM
Thanks
- Created script include SIG_hr_ServicesUtil that extends hr_ServicesUtil
- Modified the record producer for the Direct Deposit Inquiry to call SIG_hr_ServicesUtil
When creating a Direct Deposit Inquiry via Employee Service Center the same error 'The undefined value has no properties' appears in the logs.
I have been unable to find what causes this to fail. If you could have a look, that would be highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Pascal Frencken
IT Architect, Signify, The Netherlands