- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Hello ServiceNow gurus, could you please help me ?
I've created a client script to auto populate the assignment_group based of the Assigned_to. In other words, you just have to type the fulfiller's name and his service group will get populated in the assignment_group. But that works well when the fulfiller only belongs to one service group.
My issue is when the fulfiller is a member of multiple groups. What I'd like to do is to only display the service groups he is a member of into the assignment_group.
Let say for example that "Abel tuter" is a member of Service Desk and IT Device support. When you enter "abel " in the assigned_to, we only want to see these two service groups in the assignment_group instead of the list of all available service group (as shown in the pictures below)
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Incident Management
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Hi @AhuelieW ,
This is just opposite of showing only member of group which selected.
First go through the this you tube video Assignment group and Assignee .
The script include you can use.
getGroupOfAssignee: function(current) {
// Get selected assignee user sys_id from the form
var userId = current.assigned_to || '';
if (!userId) {
// No assignee selected, return no groups or all groups as per your need
return "";
}
// Query sys_user_grmember where user=userId to get group sys_ids
var gr = new GlideRecord('sys_user_grmember');
gr.addQuery('user', userId);
gr.query();
var groupIds = [];
while (gr.next()) {
groupIds.push(gr.getValue('group'));
}
if (groupIds.length == 0) {
// User is not a member of any groups, return no records
return "";
}
// Build encoded query to filter assignment groups by user's groups and active status
return 'active=true^sys_idIN' + groupIds.join(',');
}
as explained in video call this function from dynamic reference qualifier.
Thanks,
Bhimashankar H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If my response points you in the right directions, please consider marking it as 'Helpful' & 'Correct'. Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Hi @AhuelieW ,
This is just opposite of showing only member of group which selected.
First go through the this you tube video Assignment group and Assignee .
The script include you can use.
getGroupOfAssignee: function(current) {
// Get selected assignee user sys_id from the form
var userId = current.assigned_to || '';
if (!userId) {
// No assignee selected, return no groups or all groups as per your need
return "";
}
// Query sys_user_grmember where user=userId to get group sys_ids
var gr = new GlideRecord('sys_user_grmember');
gr.addQuery('user', userId);
gr.query();
var groupIds = [];
while (gr.next()) {
groupIds.push(gr.getValue('group'));
}
if (groupIds.length == 0) {
// User is not a member of any groups, return no records
return "";
}
// Build encoded query to filter assignment groups by user's groups and active status
return 'active=true^sys_idIN' + groupIds.join(',');
}
as explained in video call this function from dynamic reference qualifier.
Thanks,
Bhimashankar H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If my response points you in the right directions, please consider marking it as 'Helpful' & 'Correct'. Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Thank you @Bhimashankar H , this worked. Edited a bit the script and worked well. Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Hi @AhuelieW
In the field, assignment group, needs to be a reference type in the dictionary
In the "Dependent Field" aba try to insert assigned to. I have the inverse here
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 weeks ago
Thanks, I tried that in the first place but didn't work. Thanks though.