We're reclaiming inactive PDIs to keep them available for active builders. Learn what's changing, who's affected, and how to protect your work. Read More

How to acheive below scenario

sajampan
Tera Contributor

My query here is 

  • Similar functionality already exists for Incidents; this enhancement aims to provide consistency for RITMs.

  • The section should display only open (active) RITMs requested by the same caller.

  • Closed, cancelled, or completed RITMs should be excluded from this view to avoid clutter and improve relevance.

sajampan_0-1755754727760.png

 

 

10 REPLIES 10

Dr Atul G- LNG
Tera Patron

Hi @sajampan 

 

I already replied in your previous thread.

 

So you want to make the change in this pop-up window. Right-click on the impacted user, select Configure Dictionary, and then go to the Attributes related list.

*************************************************************************************************************
Regards
Dr. Atul G. - Learn N Grow Together
ServiceNow Techno - Functional Trainer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dratulgrover
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@LearnNGrowTogetherwithAtulG

****************************************************************************************************************

HI @Dr Atul G- LNG 

i want to enable same functionality for "Requested for " field .after clicking that relation ship button it should show the open/inprogress ritm's created by same caller

Hi @sajampan 

You need to configure the attribute, as I mentioned earlier—the same has already been done on the Caller field in the Incident form.

 

*************************************************************************************************************
Regards
Dr. Atul G. - Learn N Grow Together
ServiceNow Techno - Functional Trainer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dratulgrover
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@LearnNGrowTogetherwithAtulG

****************************************************************************************************************

Even  i tried through attribute but not working. Can you give steps via Macros and system declaratives.